Create account

replied 336d
they say being decentralized means having lots of non mining nodes and being owned in their repo by one guy is good cause "consensus" will be forced by their nodes anyway (falacy).
1 / 12
replied 336d
They advocate for the Federal Reserve pumping their bags as well as any other governmental actor
replied 336d
they dont like shitcoins (very important)
replied 336d
Then we have BCH which is a usable and pretty broadcasted peer to peer electronic cash system governed by an anarcho communist system.
replied 336d
they alleged to be the Real Bitcoin as described inside Satoshi Nakamoto whitepaper.
replied 336d
Then we have BSV, which is a Bitcoin with no limits on its blocksize and aims to become the new Internet of Value. It is savage capitalism in its view, it is all fierce competition.
replied 336d
Their mantra is: "Bitcoin is a protocol set in stone" so protocol developers here have no main stage as seen in BCH or BTC.
replied 336d
Also, in my personal experience BSV has the worst products, wallets, etc. A paradox if we take into account they are fierce capitalists.
replied 336d
Finally, we have XEC (the fork of BCH). eCash is not Bitcoin completely but mostly a renewed version of what Bitcoin Cash would have become.
replied 336d
XEC uses Avalanche consensus and Nakamoto Consensus. Using both guarantees instant finalization in almost seconds and security through SHA256 POW.
replied 336d
Here, the protocol developers have all control and dont take into account any other opinion than theirs. So it is a kind of monarchy.
replied 336d
Here devs are paid the same way miners are paid .. by block reward and transaction fees. They share incentives.
replied 336d
this guarantees protocol developers create products of quality for their community. But also little to no competition to this government in terms of product development as well.


About Privacy Terms Stats