Create account

replied 448d
anarchovegan
No, I am advocating a form of consensus. Also, as I said with rules protecting the minority. This is why we have rights and protections for minority groups.
anarchovegan
replied 447d
What form of consensus? What does it look like?
If the minority is included without their consent, what do the rules "protecting" them matter?
How isn't that baseless lip-service?
replied 447d
Majority consensus. The minority has their say, and isn't revealed to be the minority until after. The protections are real and significant. Ut has allowed the minority to grow.
anarchovegan
replied 442d
Except that the minority can't dissassociate. Right?
Can't just not be stolen from. Correct?
replied 442d
The only way to dissassociate is to leave the area of that consensus. To stay is to consent to the services and their price. You can always talk about the tax system though.
anarchovegan
replied 442d
Fortunately, you're wrong.
That's not the only way.
You're welcome to your opinion though.
anarchovegan
replied 442d
"What argument have you presented to disprove it?" Plenty. You disregard them and consider them invalid for reasons unknown to me. We're still actively discussing them.
replied 442d
Often in arguments like this it is the truth of the premise we disagree on. An argument can be valid, but wrong due to a false premise.