The best thing about this is that it shows that Bitcoin appeals to a wide variety of people. It can not be dismissed as only for libertarians, or drug dealers.
He gave good reason why they found simply using a counting method wasn't a good idea. I find they have good reasons for changing things, but do not always execute changes well.
well it's kind of a silly metric anyway. Like, I really just care about what my friends (a curated list) are talking about. why would I care if all Brazilian beliebers are tweeting now
devil's advocate: If I pay $1M for a message to be sent out through a platform is that fake/manipulation? It cost real money that could be spend elsewhere.
The funny thing is how even they say it's hard to tell, and they can get it wrong sometimes. I wouldn't doubt though, like conspiracy theories, the first person to tell it knows its...
... fake and then those who belive spread it thinking they are raising awareness. Which they shouldn't be stopped from. It's bad go censor someone for being wrong as should be obvious