Create account

replied 3d
Fnuller15
Would this not damage existing long-term smart contracts? Wasn't this one of the objections to grasberg?
replied 2d
Yes. I don't think it's worth it. IMO developing pre-consensus mechanisms like double-spend proofs should be a priority.
Fnuller15
replied 3d
Maybe. But how many longterm smart contracts do we actually have on BCH? Wouldn't the benefit outweigh the need for a few contracts to be cancelled/rewritten?
replied 3d
Any changes made now that jeopardise existing smart contracts (if there are any) would deter people from using BCH to make smart contracts in the future.
replied 3d
I fear this is a case of *perfect* being the enemy of *good*.