Create account

replied 115d
never the vaccine, because it's 100% safe and effective, Fauci is science!
https://rumble.com/vt7ee0-attorney-thomas-renz-reveals-mind-blowing-covid-jab-injury-numbers-from-dod.html
replied 115d
You have to make up claims to attack since you can't argue against actual claims.

No one said the vaccine is 100% safe since no one claims any medicine is 100% safe.
replied 115d
It is relatively safe though. Safer than many other regular medications. Do you deny all medicine? What about allergic reactions to antibiotics? Do those make you refuse antibiotics?
replied 115d
What long term safety studies can you provide?
replied 114d
What one can provide is studies showing Covid will have long term consequences. What you can not find is evidence of long term side effects from vaccination from Covid.
replied 113d
So you are unable show any long term safety studies?
replied 113d
There are long term safety studies for vaccines in general, and they are safe.

You are never able to provide any studies to back up your absurd claims, yet you ask for studies.
replied 113d
Not talking about vaccines in general.
Here is the list of 1011 studies with links to documents:
https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal/
replied 113d
That is not a link to 1011 studies... Try actually finding studies that back your claim and link those.
replied 113d
scroll one page down, even retard would find them, you are something else, beep bop
replied 112d
They are made up for the tabloids. Funny that when you link actual studies they do not back your claims. Only tabloid articles back your claims.
replied 112d
Your mental disabilities are not funny at all, but fascinating, beep bop
replied 112d
Is that a defensive response because you can not actually defend your mistakes? The fact is when you link studies it is obvious you never read or understood them.
replied 112d
When you link to blogs and other junk tabloid sources they make big claims with no evidence. When you link studies they back what I am telling you instead of your ideas.
replied 112d
psychological projection, beep bop
replied 110d
I'm not the some linking studies and making bold claims. I am simply reading the studies you link and pointing out what the study actually says. You misunderstand the headlines.
replied 109d
Your bold claims that injections are safe, but unable to show safety studies
replied 108d
The studies you link often talk about the safety of the vaccine in their conclusions. Your own links already back my claims about the safety. The risks are at the normal low rates.
replied 108d
you are unable to show any safety studies, but somehow claim they are safe
replied 108d
You already linked those studies for me.
replied 108d
What safety studies exactly? Lets go deep
replied 108d
The studies you link are the ones discomforting your claims. So you have never backed your claims. All the studies you linked highlighted the safety of the vaccines.
replied 107d
Never linked long term safety studies, because they don't exist. Show me one.
replied 107d
Long term safety studies are irrelevant. There is little to no reason to fear long term safety issues. The long term safety issues of Covid are a far worse problem.
replied 107d
If they waited for long term safety studies people would have been left to die. People would have rioted if they waited for such studies.
replied 107d
woulda coulda shouda, show me studies
replied 107d
How can you know without long term safety studies?
Ok then, can you show me any safety studies?
replied 107d
You've linked enough studies that verified the safety already.
replied 107d
And you are unable to show 1 :D
replied 106d
I am unwilling to put in the effort to look. I've linked them before. It's a pretty easy Google search.
Your inability to understand them would lead you to wild ideas though.
replied 106d
Pretty easy search, but you unable to find one :)
replied 106d
I won't bother since you already found them and posted them here. You have yet to post a single study that backs your ideas. Every study you link confirms what I am telling you.
replied 106d
You can't, clinical trials are still in progress, you are a lab rat, have fun having AIDS ;)
replied 106d
The safety studies were done before it was approved for public use. Seperate independent groups reviewed the data and did their own trials. You just bury your head in the sand though.
replied 106d
What safety studies? Show me!
replied 105d
Here, since Goggle search is beyond your capability.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/research/publications/index.html

Pick any safety study you want. General, or specific risks.
replied 104d
myopericarditis after vaccination has been periodically reported
replied 104d
Yes, and at the rate it is reported it is not a significant issue.
replied 103d
DMED
Total Number of Acute Myocardial Infarct Reports By Year up 343%
Total Number of Acute Myocarditis Reports By Year up 184%
Total Numbe of Acute Pericarditis Reports By Year up 70%
replied 103d
Exactly. That is my point. The increased rate of these rare conditions was from both Covid, and the vaccine. The amount from the vaccine are hard to distinguish from the background.
replied 104d
However, some serious adverse reactions were reported, such as the life-threatening allergic reaction, anaphylaxis
replied 104d
Yes, as happens with all medication. The rate was low enough to be of no real concern.

Comparative rated seems to be your weak point when it comes to understanding this topic.
replied 104d
no long term safety studies here, try again
replied 104d
Are you asking for information from the future and pretending you are rational?
replied 103d
oh so they don't exist?
replied 104d
Pregnant people were not included in the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.
replied 104d
third one:
following J&J/Janssen vaccination of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia, which involves blood clots in the brain with low platelet counts
replied 104d
Yup, and the rate was so low as to be difficult to distinguish between the background noise.
replied 104d
OK, 2021 first one:
Of the 8,624 Janssen vaccine recipients, there were 64 reports of anxiety-related events, including 17 reports of fainting
replied 104d
Exactly. No real problem. Funny how you are quoting a study you claimed didn't exist.
replied 103d
They don't, and you wrote that they can't exist
SILENTSAM:
Are you asking for information from the future and pretending you are rational?
replied 103d
I linked the safety studies to you, and you were just quoting them.

Long term safety studies are ones done after the fact.many years of them show how rarely there are such issues.
replied 108d
The studies simply identify what those risks are, and who is at risk. They often write how these are not reasons to avoid vaccination.
replied 108d
you are unable to show any safety studies, but somehow claim they are safe
replied 113d
You are the one making wild claims, so you are the one with the burden of proof. I do not need to provide any studies.

The links you do provide only show why you are misinformed.
replied 113d
So you are saying that vaccines in general have safety studies but covid ones don't and don't need them :D
replied 113d
The Covid vaccine has something better than a study, it has real world data. The real world data shows it is safe, and that it doesn't have long term side effects.
replied 113d
What real world data? Where is it? How long term?
replied 113d
We also see that Covid itself can have long term consequences. That is another reason it is better to train your immune system with the vaccine than the disease.
replied 113d
If you think logically about your questions they lead to vaccination being the smart choice.