Create account

replied 1014d
Yes. I accidentally invented time-travel. BCH wins!
replied 1014d
You say "accidentally". Have you tried observing this incident going backwards in time with your machine? is it then still an "accident", a "planned event", or something else?
replied 997d
circular causality and the "time-traveler's" paradox. if time-travel exists in the future, it has always existed. all events in history leading up to it's discovery are set in stone.
replied 997d
Surely you are aware of the Everett-Wheeler interpretation of QM extended to time travel? It will not "always" have existed in that model. Also, stones are not stable in time.
replied 997d
The Wheeler boundary is easily overcome. The double-slit phenomena is an artifact of the simulation. In Planck spacetime the state has to compute all possibilities for each clock cycle
replied 997d
wheeler-feynman boundary?
replied 996d
minkowsky space
replied 996d
A can easily be defined as B while C is within the D boundary of the E F and as such not really an artifact. Rather the G H of I is J dependent. Insert fancy sounding words for A-J.
replied 996d
A can easily be defined as B while C is within the D boundary of the E F and as such not really an artifact. Rather the G H of I is J dependent. Insert fancy sounding words for A-J.