No doubt thought to be a purely religious thing by our "leading experts", though it really does feel to me like some kind of machine. Is there some "religious" text that describes it?
Yes. I accidentally invented time-travel. BCH wins!
You say "accidentally". Have you tried observing this incident going backwards in time with your machine? is it then still an "accident", a "planned event", or something else?
circular causality and the "time-traveler's" paradox. if time-travel exists in the future, it has always existed. all events in history leading up to it's discovery are set in stone.
Surely you are aware of the Everett-Wheeler interpretation of QM extended to time travel? It will not "always" have existed in that model. Also, stones are not stable in time.
The Wheeler boundary is easily overcome. The double-slit phenomena is an artifact of the simulation. In Planck spacetime the state has to compute all possibilities for each clock cycle
A can easily be defined as B while C is within the D boundary of the E F and as such not really an artifact. Rather the G H of I is J dependent. Insert fancy sounding words for A-J.
A can easily be defined as B while C is within the D boundary of the E F and as such not really an artifact. Rather the G H of I is J dependent. Insert fancy sounding words for A-J.