not true at all, even with current dietary habits. And a simple switch from domesticated red meat to wild seafood would free up a lot more land for organic farming.
nope. maybe tuna (which we shouldn't eat anyway due to high mercury) but not sardines and especially not mussels which can be easily farmed on ropes. u haven't done ur homework.
show me the math. ? = "1Bn Max"? or more generally: what is the carrying capacity of planet Earth and how do we calculate it? this is not a trick question.
wouldn't u just know it. no math there either. the question remains unanswered... as always. FYI: the oceans are not going to be empty by 2048. u doom saying lunatic.
I didn't claim that oceans will be empty by a certain date, but it is undeniable that we already over-fished the oceans. We pollute the waters and carry on with unsustainable practices
u've been had, Twatter. and it's probably not the first time. Read the sources linked to that article and u'll find that they don't support the implications of the infographic.
the decline in the pacific sardine population was not caused by overfishing. it was caused by a change in oceanographic conditions toward a colder period – a natural cycle.
but sardine connoisseurs need not worry. Atlantic sardines are still very affordable which brings us to a point of common sense economics that has somehow escaped you Twatter...