Create account

replied 259d
I hope you're right (no split). But a majority of miners and exchanges will need to switch to BCHN instead of ABC, if BCH is to be saved. Otherwise there will be a split as it looks
replied 248d
Yes we keep moving in the direction we need to go. Remember anyone can split at any time. But if it's worth nothing, nobody calls it a split.
replied 248d
Yes. That is what I hope. That the majority/price of the non-IFP will be so large that an IFP chain will have no relevance to speak of.
replied 257d
BCHD is also now capable of being used as mining node software. Verde is also trying to become capable. I think it would be ideal if miners would just diversify.
replied 257d
Yes, diversification to such a degree that no node implementation has a super majority.
replied 257d
But we are not there yet.
replied 248d
Sorry I got the context of the conversation now! Yes it will be good when we get there but we are not there yet. Mining template service is a good first step.
replied 248d
We are not at global adoption yet either. What is your point? We keep moving toward success.
replied 259d
now. Much to the detriment of everybody.