Create account

replied 1968d
Another thing is that the max blocksize is capped at 32MB and #BitcoinUnlimited's work on a dynamic cap based on previous blocks has stalled. Sorry to say this guys but I see...
replied 1968d
Disgusting things happening with BCH. It's very difficult and heartbreaking to admit this to myself but I have to be honest. It really doesn't feel good, the way we're heading at.
replied 1967d
Nobody cares so you shouldn't either. The concept of Bitcoin is not compatible with our level of intelligence.
replied 1967d
Ignorance is bliss.

No it isn't.
replied 1968d
And I have to admit that some people in the BSV community were right when they said that BCH would get proof of stake because this is happening right now through Avalanche.
replied 1967d
Even if Avalanche uses PoS that doesn't mean BCH uses PoS. If Avalanche is just a preconsensus algorithm working alongside PoS it shouldn't be an issue.

If I am correct about it.
replied 1967d
But it can give people with a lot of money and no investment in BCH's infrastructure the opportunity to double spend.
replied 1967d
How would that be possible? From my understanding it would not be possible with Avalanche.
replied 1968d
The good news is you can always switch your investment over to BSV. Good Luck.
replied 1967d
I'd rather just trade these assets for profit or not invest at all :)
replied 1967d
People are making too much of a big deal about the technology. As long as it's fast, cheap, and reliable, that's all that matters and what most people will care about.
replied 1967d
That's also true.
replied 1967d
Fast, cheap, reliable.... But only pick 2