Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 1998d
anarchovegan
Some taxes are theft for sure, that's an inevitability of having any centralized power structure. That doesn't mean the alternative is going to be any more efficient.
anarchovegan
replied 1997d
What is the alternative? Not having money stolen?
Efficient = doing something in the least wasteful manner?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/efficient
Isn't voluntary more efficient?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
You have no evidence that privatized everything is more efficient. Hong Kong was a great example of good balance between public and private. Sorry but cities need utilities and police.
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
You mean that cities need utilities and defense?
I'm not against that. I'm only against systematically involuntary interactions, which the police are based upon, per funded with taxes.
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
Made a topic for easier visual viewing of the video I'm watching in relation to the topic of privitization:
https://memo.cash/topic/Privatization
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
Could you link me to what you're talking about in regard to Hong Kong?
Do you think I'm against cities having utilities? I advocate for utilities being funded voluntarily.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
I think you'll hit a point where there's too many takers and the people actually paying will start feeling like they're being taken for a ride. You know, like socialism.
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
Too many takers of what? Utilities?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
This is what I don't get about the ancap belief system. Does a completely unregulated market suddenly turn people into altruists who just let you use their infrastructure for free??
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
What do you mean by "unregulated market"?
The market, when free (no gov interference), is regulated by customers.
Do shitty stuff, go bankrupt, or be unable to buy stuff. Deadly.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
I suppose you also believe in the tooth fairy and santa clause? Have you ever observed this thing that you think exists in the real world?
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
I myself? In general, no, I have not witnessed a free market where there is no government interference.
I find that question curious. Does an answer of "no" imply impossibility? Why?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
This is how ancap is essentially the same as socialism, just with the words replaced. They hate "capitalists" you hate "governments" 😩😩😩😩 ITS THE SAME FREAKING PEOPLE😑
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
With the way people talk about capitalists and what they mean, you're quite right.
Capitalists, in common colloquial, means corporatists. Welcome to our current Orwellian reality :)
replied 1995d
You have to go back to the 19th century. To see something close to a libertarian state.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
Perhaps you could be more specific than that?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
This is exactly how ancap belief is like socialism - "true free market has never been tried!" lol. Have you not considered that the biggest winners in the market BECOME the government?
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
Yes. My lack of witnessing a "true free market" means one has never existed?
I answered your question directly; did you not turn it into a generalization about all human societies?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
Here's a fairly simple question you'll probably have no idea how to answer - If a truly free market has ever existed, why does it no longer exist?
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
Murder, democide, genocide, and so forth, is my guess.
Also, you're being very condescending and I don't like that.
But hey - you already know how you're going to dismiss me, right?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
You're not actually coming up with any cogent arguments. You're dismissing yourself. Try thinking ahead?
Question: which came first, the murder & genocide, or the government?
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
I wasn't aware that directly answering your question was supposed to be an argument.
I don't know. Do you? Based on what?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
Simple logical deduction.
You say the government is bad because they do *X*.
SO - to eliminate *X* simply eliminate the government!
But *X* obviously exists in spite of government.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
A monopoly on force exists without government?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
Go read Lord of The Flies. I'll wait.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
Read it years ago. Nice dodge.
But yeah, let's just say that you've won this because responding to you is incredibly annoying.
You win. Rejoice. Bye.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
Not a dodge, that book is famous because it's TRUE. The last ancap I tried to reason with stormed off in a triggered fit too. Just like a socialist. All emotion, zero logic.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
You call what I'm doing storming off?
Geez. Enjoy your strange world.
This isn't worth my time.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
It's absolutely a generalization about human societies. Like I said earlier, we're talking about human nature here. Ancaps don't understand basic human nature, just like socialists.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
And how do you know you're generalization of human societies is accurate?
How do you know you understand human nature?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
Republican democracy is the only defense against whales. What do you think the 1st and 2nd amendment are for? Shakespeare and hunting? NO - they're for when a whale gets in to office!
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
"Republican democracy is the only defense against whales."
Based on what?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
Historically you get people who win big in some revolution(e.g. The industrial revolution etc.) in crypto we call them "whales". They're the real monopoly on force.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
That's very vague. I'm not even sure what you're saying.
But hey, you know stuff better than I do.
Shan't I just blindly take your word on it?
You're quite the authority, huh?
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
Sometimes being concise in Twitter format harms coherency of information:
*Yes, I have considered that.
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
No, I don't, though I do believe in the spirit of the christmas holiday, and am quite appreciative to see the opposite effects from corporatism. It shows the possibilities to me.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
Huh. Friedman thinks there's a proper role of gov.
Unsurprisingly, that "freedom" is slowly eroding with inevitably more and increasing gov involvement: systematically involuntary.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1996d
You're either ruled by an elected government or by a mafia. One you have some semblance of choice, the other you have no choice but to submit or join. Perpetual power vacuum is a myth.
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
"Perpetual power vacuum is a myth."
""when someone has lost control of something and no one has replaced them.""
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_vacuum
Could you expound on that?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
Just to clarify here, you want no enforcement whatsoever. No regulation, no government, no police, no judges, no mayors or city councils, etc etc.. Is this correct?
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
What do you mean by "no enforcement whatsoever"? I'm in favor of enforcement by the customer, for instance.
I'm not in favor of enforcement by a monopoly on force that steals to exist.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1995d
It's not a monopoly on force if it's given to them via fair and free elections. The alternative is being ruled by a mafia. I believe the neither realm you desire can not exist.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
It's not a monopoly on force if the money taken from me without my consent is given via elections?
How is that free or fair? How is the other alternative being ruled by a mafia?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
I can't tell if you're a troll or just completely delusional. There's plenty of countries you can move to that have anarchy. Try Somalia! Great weather I hear.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
How do you define anarchy?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
The power vacuum that exists temporarily after an established authority is suddenly taken out. Maybe Somalia is a theocratic dictatorship now? Hard to tell at any given moment I guess.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
Why?
The Collapsed State
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1994d
Sounds like these little towns instantly established governments! Great argument for why you need one! Protects you from the tyranny of an unelected foreign super state. Perfect.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
*le sigh* Mkay. Have a good day.
anarchovegan
replied 1994d
How do you differentiate between someone who is writing for just emotional reaction (troll) vs someone who believes what they think (according to you, delusional, here)?
anarchovegan
replied 1995d
What do you think it's either rule by elected government or by mafia?
anarchovegan
replied 1996d
"You have no evidence that privatized everything is more efficient."
We just start the discussion and you head in with that I have no evidence? Jumping the gun much?