Memo
Toggle navigation
Home
Posts
Tokens
Topics
Profiles
Signup
Login
Create account
Barricade
2381d
·
Avalanche
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
This is a reminder why we need pre-consensus:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/a46uso/making_doublespending_0conf_with_bitcoin_sv/?st=jpfz8yys&sh=dba1a29d
1
/ 6
1
546
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Nikamoto
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Block Explorer (BSV)
Blockchair
WhatsOnChain
ViaWallet
BCHSVExplorer
Maybe we still don't need that and just need to ask miners. But yeah it's a big issue
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
homopit
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Ask miners what?
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Nikamoto
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Block Explorer (BSV)
Blockchair
WhatsOnChain
ViaWallet
BCHSVExplorer
Which tx they'll include
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Barricade
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Isn't it called pre-consensus?
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Nikamoto
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Block Explorer (BSV)
Blockchair
WhatsOnChain
ViaWallet
BCHSVExplorer
I don't think so. In pre consensus they don't disagree on which tx is the valid one, where as here they can and you have to ask all the miners to see if it's a double spend attack
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Barricade
replied
2381d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
In pre-consensus they agree which one will be included in the next block. Are you talking about double spend proofs?
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...