Create account

replied · 66d
you get that anyway on BCH.
I don't think LN on BTC as it is currently architected will ever become more than a computer science curiosity."
Nothing supports this argument better than the fact that LN is 3 years late and it's being hyped using lies and blatantly bullshit marketing campaigns.
replied · 66d
It's ok to don't like LN, but it has some interesting use cases (see satoshis.place, LN apps could be a huge thing)
Coinspice made a video about LN, they show that it's easy to use
replied · 65d
Let's don't play innocent, you know very well BTC restricted its on-chain scaling and put all its eggs in the LN basket. The LN doesn't just have to be useful, it has to solve scaling.
replied · 65d
Yeah the reliance on LN is what ruined BTC for me, they have a perfect, simple scaling mechanism and they're not using it because it helps them shill Liquid and collect LN fees
You sir, have a functional brain.

Congratulations.
replied · 65d
If you don't put all the eggs on the LN basket it won't work cause it needs capacity. But yeah it needs to solve that ..
They let bch-guys fork off, that's more than enough
replied · 65d
That's not exactly right: they don't let anything, we just don't need their permission to fork off.
replied · 65d
Bch has like 10% of btc hashrate and same hash algo isnt it ? So yeah you need their permission
replied · 65d
But miners are not against BCH at all.