Create account

replied 1872d
you get that anyway on BCH.
I don't think LN on BTC as it is currently architected will ever become more than a computer science curiosity."
replied 1872d
Nothing supports this argument better than the fact that LN is 3 years late and it's being hyped using lies and blatantly bullshit marketing campaigns.
Nikamoto
replied 1872d
It's ok to don't like LN, but it has some interesting use cases (see satoshis.place, LN apps could be a huge thing)
Coinspice made a video about LN, they show that it's easy to use
replied 1872d
Let's don't play innocent, you know very well BTC restricted its on-chain scaling and put all its eggs in the LN basket. The LN doesn't just have to be useful, it has to solve scaling.
replied 1872d
Yeah the reliance on LN is what ruined BTC for me, they have a perfect, simple scaling mechanism and they're not using it because it helps them shill Liquid and collect LN fees
replied 1872d
You sir, have a functional brain.

Congratulations.
Nikamoto
replied 1872d
If you don't put all the eggs on the LN basket it won't work cause it needs capacity. But yeah it needs to solve that ..
They let bch-guys fork off, that's more than enough
Barricade
replied 1872d
That's not exactly right: they don't let anything, we just don't need their permission to fork off.
Nikamoto
replied 1872d
Bch has like 10% of btc hashrate and same hash algo isnt it ? So yeah you need their permission
Barricade
replied 1872d
But miners are not against BCH at all.