One is not a free thinker if they are following popular conspiracy theories. One also is not following events unquestionably if they expect logical consistency and understand science.
While that is true that popularity doesn't make it untrue, the popular conspiracy theories have been debunked, and the sources found to be trying to intentionally manipulate people.
I mostly only speak against conspiracy theories I once fell for. I once believed climate change was a hoax, and that 911 was an inside job, until I looked deeper into these subjects.
While I was never a covidiot, I do speak out against those conspiracy theories since the data shows how laughable they are. The only narrative being spun are by conspiracy theorists.
Some conspiracy theories around covid are batshit cultist nonsense. Equally, the ‘mainstream’ narrative around covid is batshit cultist nonsense. Why choose between extremes?
SilentSam is a binary (non)thinker. If you don't accept the latest propaganda aired in mainstream media then you're a conspiracy theorist who believes in all non-sensensical theories.
That may very well be true, but in no way does denying conspiracy theory mean denying corruption. Often conspiracy theories are created by the corrupt to help spread their corruption.
You are so certain about your conspiracy theories without having any logical consistency to the stories. You just laugh science and evidence away with your faith in conspiracy theories