Create account

replied 1457d
Do you NOT believe our species is capable of, or willing to weaponize disease or that big pharma censors information about viable alternatives to vaccines? There's 21 billion at stake
2 / 51
replied 1456d
The danger that the #fuckingcapitalists present is that they will not share the vaccine with the world instead demanding profits. It breeds dangerous mutations like the Delta variant.
replied 1456d
How about not putting any research into a widely available, OTC alternative that could have been studied with the same resources the vaccines enjoyed? Oh wait, there's less profit.
replied 1456d
Again, you fucking idiot, symptom suppression isn't the goal of a vaccine! It's about immunity and stopping the spread. That's the more significant goal. Your miracle cure isn't.
replied 1456d
If you're going to hurl around insults, there's really no point having an exchange. RIGHT NOW, we can't reasonably conclude the vaccines offer immunity.
replied 1456d
Even big pharma will tell you the vaccines don't offer immunity, merely a reduction in severity of symptoms and a reduction in morbidity; both of which Ivermectin might do.
1
replied 1456d
God are you fucking stupid. YOUR BODY IS WHAT GIVES YOU IMMUNITY. YOU NEED A VACCINE TO STIMULATE AN IMMUNE RESPONSE. IVERMECTIN CAN'T DO THAT. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT A VACCINE IS?
1
1,024
replied 1456d
Lets swear at people, use upper case, and repeat stupid things that have already been shown to be wrong. That has to make us look clever right? lightrider is just a stupid little troll
replied 1456d
The fact that I know that I'm talking about is that makes me seem clever. The fact that you idiot antivaxers and covidiots don't understand shit is why you will suffer ridicule forever
replied 1456d
Not antivax, anti guinea pig is all. The patients I set up on home oxygen were all having hydroxychloroquine prescribed by the infectious disease docs with positive results too.
replied 1456d
My mother has a damaged immune system, can she still take Hydroxychloroquine if she gets Covid? She's allergic to Ivermectin. & doctors tell her she can't take vaccine either.
1
replied 1455d
Check out some of the research on NAC. It shouldn't be taken to mean official medical advice, I'm not a clinician.
1
replied 1456d
Don't ask random racists/antivaxers on the internet for medical advice. Seek a qualified medical professional for assistance.
replied 1456d
I don't think you have to explain to bregecko why she should not ask you for medical advice lightrider.
1
555
replied 1456d
burn
replied 1456d
Apparently I do have to explain. Which says more about you than me.
replied 1456d
I suppose lack of reading comprehension is also part of what "makes you seem clever" (see 4 posts back). The meaning of what I said here was quite easy to understand. bregecko got it.
1
555
replied 1456d
They weren't asking me. It's your reading comprehension that is questionable you fucking idiot. Along with with every other aspect of your mental ability.
replied 1456d
Still not getting it I see. Looking clever indeed.
replied 1456d
Yeah I get that you're trying to pin your racism and stupidity on me. It's pathetic and no one intelligent is going to fall for it. Try harder to be wittier than a 3rd grader shithead.
replied 1456d
I've been following this conversation for a long time. I haven't seen anything even remotely racist....
What did I miss? How is he a racist? Sounds like a troll copout.
1
10,000
replied 1455d
His post history going back years documents well his terrible opinions and shitty perspective. This conversation is a drop in the Nazi bucket.
replied 1455d
I'm curious about actual examples. At least one.
Otherwise you're making yourself look like a typical 'new age liberal' that throws the 'racist' label at any opposition. Being honest.
replied 1455d
The past of which you lie is hard to document properly. But, exactly how is this current conversation a "drop in the Nazi bucket"? What exactly did I say that was even a little "nazi"?
replied 1455d
Still not getting it. I am successfully pinning YOUR racism back on you where it belongs. You are racist against white men. I am not at all a racist. You just use that word as a weapon
replied 1456d
That still doesn't make it a substitute for a vaccine. If you are afraid of taking a vaccine that's fine but don't tell other people that they just need a bullshit cure instead.
replied 1456d
Not once did I use the word cure in any of our exchanges.
replied 1456d
To be skeptical about this NEW medical science they are testing out on the public does not make one an anti-vaxer. Even the most qualified scientists & doctors don't know yet
replied 1456d
OK, I get tempted too often to explain why stupid claims are stupid, but even I will not try to explain how that post was dumb.
1
1
replied 1456d
Oh, and a functioning immune system will also detect dangerous things, it should not need some artificial untested voodoo addition, especially when cov19 is not a real danger.
replied 1456d
Yes, I understand the mechanics of immunizations. For all you know at this point, there's no immunity. hence the reports of other people contracting it after the jab.
replied 1456d
Your argument assumes vaccine safety, which there isn't. Ivermectin could be used as a until the trials finalize. We need to establish some clear points here if you want to continue.
replied 1456d
Ivermectin isn't POSSIBLY a life saver. It's saved many lives already. In places that allow it to be used, like Florida ect.
1
1,024
replied 1456d
Fine, let doctors use it as they see fit. It's still not a fucking vaccine substitute nor does it have anything to do with immunity or the prevention of viral spread. Stop conflating.
replied 1456d
The vaccines don't prevent spread, the manufacturers would love to draw that conclusion but can't yet. There's a reason certain things made available over the counter though.
replied 1456d
Last I heard, the "vaccines" were only tested for preventing symptoms. I think anything beyond that is wishful thinking. Also, preventing symptoms can mean suppressing immune system.
replied 1456d
Maybe I should clarify this ("immune system" part). A fever for example is almost always a response by your immune system, it is not directly caused by stuff that attacks your body.
1
replied 1456d
Suppressing this fever will remove a tool in the toolbox of the body, which makes it less efficient in doing its job, which in turn, on makes you more sick. A dangerous thing to do
replied 1456d
Exactly. Many doctors have expressed their concerns about that very issue for long term after vaccines. Especially for children
replied 1456d
Yes, that's right, the only thing that can actually fight this thing might very well be suppressed by the "vaccine". The complete opposite of what you want.
replied 1456d
I agree. There's no way to know long term effects either. This type of vaccine has never been done before. Suspicious that they're pushing them so hard....
replied 1456d
In Virginia they're giving away a free gun to people as an incentive to vaccinate
Odd
replied 1456d
To people with a brain, this is an obvious red flag. Just like the super heavy censorship of truth, the bullying of people who speak up and so on. It is ridiculous at this point.
1
replied 1456d
Sorry. I just wanted to put the info out there. It might save someone's life.
replied 1456d
My beliefs are irrelevant. Yes it's possible but stupid to develop hyper deadly viruses because they will kill everyone not just your enemy. There is no alternative to a vaccine.
replied 1456d
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369220348984

mmmkay
replied 1456d
Yeah like I said, anecdotes aren't data. Link even asserts that real study is needed. And symptom suppression didn't indicate immune response or reduction of transmissibility.
replied 1456d
Oh, there's data there, it's not an official study though, no argument on that front. That said, there's no formal study for vaccine efficacy, until 2023.
replied 1456d
Viruses require a vaccine to be protected from them. They are different from germ based diseases. You still don't understand the mechanisms that enable the body to defend against them.
replied 1456d
Sure I do. I earned my keep in medicine for several years and have a minor in it's study. Don't just make assumptions, you might learn something.
replied 1456d
Doesn't mean you know what your talking about. Lots of quack doctors saying stupid bullshit nonsense lately. Maybe you should have studied more. What I can see is that you're confused.
replied 1456d
Share some evidence to the contrary then. I'd love to see something concrete. For now, Ivermectin could potentially be cost effective and widely disbursed while trials are running.


About Privacy Terms Stats