Create account

replied 1950d
Sk8eM dUb
Honestly I really don't care. I will hold both coins from the split. Both coins will be fast, cheap, and reliable. I favor BCH because CSW is a douche. I could careless about the tech
Nikamoto
replied 1949d
If you select a decentralized coin by looking at it's leader you missed the point of crypto currencies
homopit
replied 1949d
When one leader is a known conman, you should certainly look at leaders.
replied 1950d
Classic NPC focused on the personality of ONE GUY. This is about the consensus rules. The performance issues can be worked on independently without any hardforks EVER.
replied 1950d
Yes because one guy owns it. That's the CSW chain. The guy creating money for the world with 400 patents purpose is just to sue everybody. That's why he will mine at 0 for years.
replied 1950d
That's not how this works. Calvin has most hash by far anyway. There are about 10,000 mining nodes on SV... that's not one guy... and the consensus rules are now set in stone.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 1950d
So you're not going away if ABC dies/admits defeat?
replied 1950d
Nope. They are both considered Bitcoin. Just different paths. If SV should gain traction, most merchants will accept both. They aren't going to kick BCH to the curb,because it works.