Create account

replied 1336d
There is no mass deaths from the vaccines. You've never been able to show that it is killing a lot of people. You've only shown rare side effects happen. Then you deny the Covid deaths
replied 1336d
replied 1336d
Robert Malone is a quack trying to get fame from being an anti-vaxxer. So him being the source makes whatever he linked questionable.

It's interesting wording. Pretty clickbait.
replied 1335d
Good to have your BS arguments on the blockchain for future generations. Calling us "anti-science" but all they do is to discredit/attack source without looking into the subject matter
replied 1335d
17 days ago I asked: Explain why Sam Harris expert in this field, but Robert W Malone, MD, Dr. Peter McCullough, Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM, PhD) are not?
SAM: Robert Malone is :D
replied 1335d
I answered that by telling you Sam is a dr of neurology, and not an expert. He does interview various experts though, including those on vaccines, and viruses, and similar topics.
replied 1335d
It is the many doctors and experts in these fields, and the colleges who worked with Malone on those mRNA studies who have discredited him. It is their peers that exposed these quacks.
replied 1336d
It essentially says that of the rare cases someone died after the vaccine, that 93% of those deaths were from the vaccine, and 7% of other causes. I wonder what other studies say.
replied 1335d

more often than covid, cure worse than disease
replied 1335d
That was not the essence. Conclusion: "Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs."
replied 1335d
At such low rates that they are more of an interest of study for improvement of vaccines, and not a reason to fear vaccines. This study is a reason to trust the safety of vaccines.
replied 1335d
What low rates? Any numbers?
replied 1334d
In your post there was 1200 fatalities in 23 million doses, and at most 93% of those 1200 deaths were from the vaccine. So 1100 deaths out of 23 million using numbers from your sources
replied 1334d
So you agree that 1 in 19000 Dies from jab. At least we are getting closer. You could die, witch is normal, vaccinate you sheep!
replied 1334d
No, but using your numbers it could be as high as that.in reality it could never be that high. It would mean covering up mass deaths. It would imply more than 200K dead.
replied 1334d
Now compare that to the millions of deaths from Covid and you see that even in the worst case for the vaccine that it is far safer than Covid.
replied 1334d
show where you got millions of deaths of healthy or young people
replied 1333d
He obtains his information from 2 sources, failstream media and/or his asshole.
replied 1333d
This woman spies on people
replied 1333d
here we go into schizo land :D
replied 1333d
also the manufacturers of the products (Trusted News Initiative)
replied 1333d
Show me were I said it was only young and healthy people.

Here is the lists of deaths by country, and cases.

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html
replied 1333d
Show me where I said that you said it :D I said that young and healthy don't die, death has average 4 commodities. Even sick don't die if treated early.
replied 1334d
That's only deaths, and only those Pfizer could not hide. There are also other severe neurological, heart, joint problems
replied 1334d
Let's also remember that the harsher reactions from the vaccine are also found in the older and more vulnerable populations. Not healthy people.
replied 1334d
just like covid, they correlate perfectly, common denominator is the Spike protein. Thats why we need treatments not jabs
replied 1333d
No, that is not the common denominator at all. Health is the common denominator.

The fact is at your worst numbers provided vaccine deaths are rare, and Covid deaths are not.
replied 1333d
It is, and your definition of "rare"?
replied 1334d
Likely since you cherry pick studies we will find it's an even lower rate than that when looking at the billions of doses.
replied 1334d
unlikely,
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
replied 1334d
Are these the trials you claim never happened, or finished yet? Love the contradictions and cognitive dissonance.
replied 1334d
NOT FINISHED, you RETARD! :D
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04368728
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 15, 2023
replied 1336d
How would you know, how to measure?
replied 1336d
Well, unlike you I can compare two numbers and see which is larger, and by how much. That is why I know the fee vaccine side effects are inconsequential in comparison.
replied 1335d
Why you unable to show where do you pull your numbers from?
replied 1335d
I get my numbers from the studies you link, and from other experts. The numbers you link are always pics like this with no source. They are often lies that do not reflect the real data
replied 1335d
replied 1334d
Ok, now find a study to back these absurd claims. Links like these are just anti-vaxxer propaganda. When you post real studies they have numbers and data that back what I am saying.
replied 1334d
Absurd, I agree, numbers from Pfizer :D