Create account

2056d
Looks like some SV shills/trolls & even a BU dev have started a new sub-Reddit - /r/BitcoinCashBCH/ to try to stur up shit in the BCH community. Don't let them.
replied 2056d
I'm bored with these wars on Reddit.
replied 2056d
TBH me too. Just wanted to give a heads-up, since someone is trying to stir up shit again. Just like the last time (fall 2018).
replied 2056d
These constant fights on Reddit have led to the fact that I hardly use it any more. I hope it doesn't happen here.
replied 2056d
That's what cryotacritc is here to do. Set a narrative, split the community, and drive people away.
replied 2056d
Same as Twatter, look at the similarities
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Too bad unfettered free speech doesn't let you guys get away with lying like this. I'm not divisive because I don't hold your personal opinions. Stop that centralized bullcrap
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
I'm here to stay baby. I like memo for it's free speech. Freedom! Not even jerks can be censored from the blockchain!
replied 2056d
I don't want to, and I'm gonna censor someone. If you harass me or annoy me, I will mute you. My muted list is already long.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Muting isn't censorship. That's your personal right. It wouldn't be Censorship for me to not listen to someone in real life. It's censorship to force them to stop talking.
replied 2056d
Technically you’re censoring what you are listening to
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
It means to suppress or delete. Not to ignore. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor
replied 2056d
You would then be suppressing what you are hearing
replied 2056d
I have never experienced a Reddit war, what happens exactly ?
replied 2056d
Imagine how many shills and trolls you could by with say a 76m investment. That's anything crypto related on reddit.
replied 2056d
Trust me. Keep your sanity and stay away from that place :-)
replied 2056d
...usually spurred by bad actors infiltrating discussion threads to derail it and sow doubt in peoples minds. BCH groups are under almost constant attacks from trolls in Reddit.
replied 2056d
Lots of discussions derailed by insults, personal attacks, conspiracy theories, implying evil intentions when people are just making arguments from a purely technical standpoint etc.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
This post is an attack on free speech.
replied 2056d
No, it is just a heads up. Are you retarded?
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Are you a namecalling Social Justice Warrior?
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
The BCH community isn't one central thing. people can and should have varying and diverse opinions.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
No, thats me that started that sub. Stop trying to smear me and all the other people trying to participate in it, SJW.
replied 2056d
Jacob, you've already shown your colors months ago. You have very little reputation left with those who've been paying attention.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
I bet you can't tell me a single thing I've done that's worse than Amaury calling Roger an idiot and Peter Rizun manipulative. Yet you still love Amaury, don't you?
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Oh, so ad hominem then. What I'm saying is wrong because of my personal character. Typical SJW move. Shew.
replied 2056d
... why would I join a subreddit run by such an antagonist, firstly?
Secondly, I've said pretty well the same thing wrt Amaury as I am you. I run BCHD lol.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
What makes me an antagonist? The fact that I don't suck Amaury's dick?
replied 2056d
Listen to yourself for christ sakes.
ur a cunt m8.
Just simmer down. Communicate with a little respect.
replied 2056d
He's not here to do that he's here to attempt to divide the community. Nothing but a troll with an agenda.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
If you're going to make a claim about my character, back it the fuck up.
replied 2056d
You're entire profile is my "Example A" lol
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
That's not an argument
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
You're the one calling me a cunt, SJW
replied 2056d
You have been an incessant cunt on Telegram BCHGang as well, trying to stir up shit for weeks. Don't think we are not noticing.
replied 2056d
Months. Critic, jim and cryptorebel have been trying to take the /r/bsv subreddit but failing miserably

Pretty funny though, they're actually driving even more people to hate BSV lol
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Cause that's worse than squatting on a sub with the malicious intent to misinform people? How would you like it if all the BCH domains were squatted on by BTC maxis?
replied 2055d
They already are, currently r/bitcoin is controlled by BTC maxis.

Ironically, BCH proponents control r/btc.

If you're expecting fairness from social media, you might be an idiot.
replied 2055d
Nothing about /r/bsv is misinformation though, except for the off-topic shit spammed by cryptorebel. Usually it's just updates on trial proceedings, stupid Calvin quotes and CSW antics
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
No I wasn't liar. I told Amaury to stop being a dick, and Mike banned me.
replied 2056d
Amaury has a very keen bullshit detector, and yes he is a dick to con artists & armchair experts contributing with zero.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
So this includes Roger Ver, Peter Rizun, and Andrew Stone? You're fucking lost.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
I only had one convo ever on BCHGang and it was a hour long at most
replied 2056d
Your memory does not serve you well.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
Reeeeeeeeeeeee
replied 2056d
Just that you choose to phrase it that way is a good indication of your cuntness. Sorry.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
You're the one calling me names.
replied 2056d
Seems like random chitchat about the development of abc itself.
replied 2056d
It's moderated by BSV shills that were kicked out of r/btc for spamming and breaking reddit tos.
Cryptacritic
replied 2056d
No it's not liar
replied 2056d
Exactly