While O do not care for anarchism myself, it is wrong to pretend they are just wannabe fascists. Well, maybe some of the AnComs might be... The AnCaps at least make some sense.
To dat they are fascists may go a bit far though. Better to just sya they are people since most people are corrupt when they come into power. Often with good intentions.
Like Roger whining how r/bitcoin is not about free speech, while he only cares because he is not in control of it as he uses same practices to censor people from r/btc.
You know the mod logs of r/btc are public, and we can see that r/btc does not have the censorship that r/Bitcoin does. The censorship began long before the BCH fork was discussed.
No, that is wrong. Lots of anti BCH people in r/btc. Again the public logs show this is untrue. The communist bots. Why assume it is bots, instead of just an active sub?
I have experienced it personally and seen it with at least 10 people before. The thing is they don't complain as much, you know their house their rules, but hypocrisy is strong here.
I do find that when people are quick to dislike a flaw in people it is sometimes because that flaw exists within hem, and makes them assume it is in others.
I tend to agree about that because in Bangkok meet he publicly uttered that he prefers not to split while privately I am sure he was already plotting a quick break.
Sure sherry, your feelings are more credible than Roger, the guy who has been supporting Bitcoin longer than anyone here.I'm sure he wanted a contentious split to his preferred fork /s
Ans it's not censorship. Reddit channel is essentially a "property" and owner can set his own rules there. Roger wants to sit on your sofa and set his rules like a baby fascist.
He uses every opportunity to spread how r/bitcoin is not fair and is using censorship which is unacceptable for bitcoin, and then he does the same with r/btc. Power grabbing fool.
I'm thinking he may actually be retarded at this point, all he does is lie. I've even tried to ask him to explain his beliefs or sell me on SV, but he just insists on misleading people
You and eye1 tend to make similar frequent typos, and parrot a lot of the same off-topic issues and already-refuted arguments. Seems a bit suspicious, or are SV fans just unoriginal?
Anarchism = fascism? Lol there's really no bounds to your stupidity, I'm not sure what you *do* understand at this point. Unless you enjoy being a clown just to imitate "daddy Craig"
Simple... as anarchist can't win being a fascist due to a lack of character, he wines how world is not fair and oppress him. Unless he is able to power grab and then reveals himslef.
The best definition of anarchy I came across is by Chomsky: Any form or domination and authority has a burden of proof to bear https://www.youtube.com/embed/7_Bv2MKY7uI
BCH supporters at the moment when they had to compete on a free market and win, rather submitted to checkpointed dictatorship to a single developer who has a little trace of leadership