It is interesting that when I show clear evidence against conspiracy theories you guys call it an ad hominem attack, and do so within an ad hominem attack topic.
You don't show any evidence at all. You attack Medical professionals, lawyers, scientists, journalists, etc. Then act like the ones who share their views are the ones making claims.
I've not attached actual professionals. That would be you. They are all "mainstream" in your eyes, and therefore wrong. You mostly listen to bloggers who link to fake scientists.
Bleep Blop 🤖
You can't act as if every discredited scientists is actually a genius who is before his time. The fa t is you have to look to a scientists peers to judge a scientist.
Look who's acting here. Hilarious... Again you're proving my point. All you do is discredit scientists, and act like people who share videos are the ones making claims.
You make claims as well, besides the things you link to. The studies and blogs you link are you attempt to support the claims you generally make. The blogs support you, not the studies
You don't get to claim to listen to scientists and professionals because you found own or two quacks like Malone, while you dismiss entire fields of scientific work on the subject.
That's one of your false assumptions. I share videos of Dr. Malone, key inventor of mRNA technology, doesn't mean I don't research anything else. Who only discredit, who u think u are?
He is not a key inventor at all. He was one person in a larger team who played a part in early mRNA research, but none of the vaccine research.
The team discredited him, not me.
Here we go with the troll tricks again. Trying to bring the focus on your bullshit smear campaign, and then try to lay that shit on others with a smear-by-association attack 💩🥱
It is not my smear campaign. Malone has been exposed as a list. He was clearly shown to be one of many people, and no key player. The research was not on the vaccine.
It is his peers that have all shown what he worked on and how his claims are bogus. He is just exploiting the conspiracy crowd for a bit of money and fame.
You completely try to put all the focus on some fact checker bullshit smear attack. I'm not gonna argue that with you, that was not even the point. You distract like this all the time.
I have not done that at all. I have put it on the team that worked with him, and his peers that do similar research. You only listen to discredited people who confirm your bias.
