Create account

replied 246d
I think that member (Reddit on the blockchain) is the **upper limit** of what should be stored on the blockchain as content.
FUBAR-BDHR
replied 245d
Unless the blockchain is specific to storing such content. Say a sidechain linked to the main chain. .
replied 245d
agreed
Unusual Uther
replied 245d
Yeah well, sidechains are not blockchains unless you have machines mining them. Then at that point they are barely sidechains.
replied 243d
I won't be the judge of that. But honestly (no pun intented) storing large articles seldom makes sense. But I think having an option to pay for storing certain articles could be
replied 243d
(--^ attempt at fixing my sentence :-p)
replied 243d
But default behaviour should NOT be storing on the blockchain (arrrgh).
replied 243d
usefull. But default behaviour should be storing on the blockchain, because it if often not neccessary.
replied 246d
I'm curious if users will write **longer texts** on member now, since member supports **markdown**.
replied 243d
I did just now, and I failed :-p
Forgetting a "not" makes my text nonsense :-)
replied 243d
Try to write a memorandum using
# Titel
## section
### subsection

Text marked **bold** and *Italic*.