Create account

replied 1332d
before bot answers that jabs are not experimental i'll ask him what year we are in atm?
Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 15, 2023
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
replied 1332d
They are obviously not experimental. Your link is irrelevant. It is in wide usage. By definition it is not experimental.
replied 1331d
So again you did not answer when will clinical trials end and what year we are in?
replied 1331d
It's mostly an irrelevant question since you refuse to look up the answers. You just stay in denial when shown facts.
replied 1331d
Bot unable to answer what year we are in. First clinical trials should end in 2023, now in recruiting phase, YOU are the research ;)
replied 1332d
Here we go again with the definitions:

1. (of a new invention or product) based on untested ideas or techniques and not yet established or finalized
Example: "an experimental drug"
replied 1332d
Why pretend it is a new invention? Why pretend the ideas are untested? They have done so for decades. So it does not fit your criteria.
replied 1331d
As many expert witnesses are pointing out, mRNA gene therapy is new technology. The covid vaccines are still in trial phase, thus not properly tested and not yet established/finalized.
replied 1331d
By experts you mean discredited cranks.
replied 1330d
GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION HAS BEEN SIGNED BY 60,000
DOCTORS
https://gbdeclaration.org/view-signatures/
replied 1330d
Yeah, I've seen lists like that. When you look into it you find almost all have not scientific credentials, or do so in an unrelated field. These are doctors who give Botox injections.
replied 1330d
Lists like this let you know when a group has no credit. It's like the lost of climate change denier scientists. Most have no degrees, the few with degrees are geologists.
replied 1329d
Ah I get it now. Most of the 60k health professionals are discredited botox docs. Just like climate denier scientists. Makes total sense. Well debunked
replied 1328d
Yes, when they point to a list anyone can sign as their argument it shows they have no legitimacy. They never have any real argument, or any data that backs up their claims.
replied 1328d
Most are chiropractors and naturopaths. There are some legitimate doctors. They are just idiots. I know a doctor who can't believe the stupidity of some crank doctors.
replied 1327d
You're making all this shit up. They're not even listed. If you had actually looked into it you w've come up with different arguments. Only an idiot such as yourself could ignore this.
replied 1327d
You've been making shit up this whole time. I was making an assumption about them, but I can say for certain that any people who signed who are doctors are fools, and shit doctors.
replied 1327d
"I was making an assumption about them, but I can say for certain..."
replied 1327d
I was assuming that many were chiropractors, and plastic surgeons. I know they few that actually have medical degrees are shit doctors. Most are just random anti-vaxxers.
replied 1327d
Good meme though. I do feel like the guy in Idiocracy trying to explain things to simple people while you all laugh with confidence.
replied 1326d
Nothing funny about this situation. The only thing that's laughable are your ridiculous attempts to debunk everything. Still assuming and "knowing". Despite the fact that you cant know
replied 1326d
...they're not even listed publicly. Discrediting 60k health professionals because they're calling for focused protection. Only an "anti-science" fool could respond that way.
replied 1326d
I really doubt you have any real idea of what science even is. You are putting together a few pop culture ideas. I majored in physics and minored in philosophy. I know real science.
replied 1325d
Yeah but that must've been a quack community college. Your professors weren't real, but discredited quacks and liars. I'm just assuming, but I can say for certain they were idiots.
replied 1325d
The difference being I am certain people are quacks based on their claims not fitting the data, where as for you it is an emotional response to not agreeing with your ideas.
replied 1325d
what data, be specific for once
replied 1326d
Enlighten us what science is?
replied 1325d
A philosophy of attaining knowledge by disproving what is not true to become ever closer to what is true is a pretty simple explanation.
replied 1325d
and the method of disproving is...
replied 1325d
The scientific method...
replied 1325d
God bot, so when will you start using it?
replied 1326d
In no way do you show any capacity to follow, or understand the scientific method. I doubt you really even understand the philosophy of science beyond pop culture references.
replied 1325d
I can tell you havent learned shit from your education. Maybe because your profs were all quacks. Science is what we know, philosophy what we don’t know. Apparently you're confused.
replied 1325d
Science is just one particular method of philosophy. Early on some called it natural philosophy.

Science is not what we know, those are facts. Science gives us facts.
replied 1324d
Science is what we know based on the facts it provides us. Are you trying to debunk Bertrand Russell now? Based on facts you clearly show a narcissistic personality disorder.
replied 1324d
No, science is a method for finding truth, it is not a collection of facts. Bertrand Russell does not claim science is a list of facts.
replied 1324d
You should probably look up Bertrand Russell before pretending you are stating his ideas. He is also not the only person to have a say in the matter though.
replied 1324d
"Science is what we know, and philosophy is what we don't know. — Bertrand Russell. In Bertrand Russell Speaks his Mind (1960)".

You're hilarious.
😂😂😂
replied 1316d
Yes, but that was not said as a serious definition of science. Look into the context of that quote.

He was one of many philosophers of science, which is about the method of science.
replied 1326d
Scientific method is to question and criticize, you just follow corrupt authority
replied 1325d
Perfect description of Sam the Quack: Never question, never doubt, never admit wrong, when challenged becomes hostile (discredit by association attack)
replied 1325d
You have to find me being wrong before I could admit to being wrong. Despite how much I have shown you are wrong you can't admit it. Numbers and real studies mean nothing to you.
replied 1324d
You showed nothing. All you do is discredit doctors. You claim 1% mortality rate and to know ppl individual risks. Thats Quackery!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913136/
replied 1324d
No one has shown that they are real doctors. You said the list is private.

Approximations and averages are not quackery, they are a major part of science.
replied 1324d
replied 1324d
You really think you can BS your way out of everything? To determine risk you need to know a lot about them. You even gave medical advice based on assumptions. That makes you a Quack!
replied 1316d
To know their risk you do need to know a lot about them, but to know their risk compared to their risk of a vaccine side effect I do not need to know anything.
replied 1315d
Dear dudes. Until memo makes notifications for direct replies only, can I request you guys start a new thread? I want out, but keep getting notifications for this discussion.
replied 1314d
thats what I was saying back there with empower users with tools to protect against trolls and spam, and memocash app has what you need, I am not getting any of this bullshit there
replied 1315d
I can't help but laugh when realising that this thread has been holding people hostage to it. It has been a pretty epic monstrosity. I would love to trace it out and map the tree.
replied 1314d
You the one holding hostage, always wanting the last word and never admit your wrong. Desperately trying to debunk and discredit everything but only making a fool out of yourself 👽
replied 1314d
You have given me no reason to admit to being wrong for anything. I am completely willing to change my mind if given reason and evidence. Your arguments lack reason, and evidence.
replied 1314d
Hell, since the beginning I have changed my mind on one thing. I am more open now to the idea it was a lab leak that China is covering up. Though that doesn't mean Fauci funded it.
replied 1314d
Hell, the tiny $600K the US gave towards that labs construction was nothing. The French helped them design and build it, and left in frustration at them cutting corners.
replied 1314d
The fact that the virus is deadlier than any flu, and is stressing our healthcare systems, and that vaccination is the best and safest way to handle it have never been debunked.
replied 1296d
It is deadlier, but only to the vaccinated
replied 1296d
Do you say that just to sound dumb, or do you actually believe that? Do you think they just make up that most of the very sick and dying are unvaccinated?
replied 1295d
replied 1295d
That is hilarious. If you are going to look to tabloids for news do you also have updates on Bigfoot and Elvis?
replied 1295d
Have fun having AIDS :D
replied 1295d
There is no reason to think it is causing any immune problems in people. You can't provide any evidence that it does. Your tabloid article couldn't back up it's claims.
replied 1295d
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Targets USP33-IRF9 Axis via Exosomal miR-148a to Activate Human Microglia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33936086/
replied 1294d
Another good study. It shows that Covid can have damaging long term effects on other organs. This study shows why people should be vaccinated rather than catch the disease.
replied 1294d
You see big scary words and link the study without reading it and seeing the study is not saying what you think it says.

These studies are saying what I have been telling you.
replied 1294d
Have fun having AIDS
replied 1295d
I don't know what this story is. Not needed
First few months of Omicron
75% were vax, 32% fully vax infected boosted where suggested....
replied 1295d
Yet somehow they KNOW that it prevents deaths and sever illness
At the time ONE death with almost no public info
Hospitalizations were al but non- existent so they had to bend truth...
replied 1295d
They finally had to admit the supposed hospitalization numbers were people that were in hospitals for other reasons that tested positive
+ ppl stupid w fear via positive home test
replied 1295d
No story needed or article needed just look at the publicly recorded #s from around the world
replied 1295d
Ironically the countries that have a problem with low vax rates like Africa ect. suffering from the LEAST casualties percentage wise
Where's this proof they keep reporting vax ANY good
replied 1294d
That was a lot of ignorant gibberish you just spouted. Africa is having a horrible time with Covid. Everything you said is backwards and wrong.
replied 1293d
Africa has 1.3 billion people & has had 240K deaths from COVID. I calc about 18.5/100K deaths. US is 880K of 330 million people. A rate of 267/100k approx 14.4 times worse than Africa.
replied 1293d
This article is interesting about Africa's COVID situation:
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/01/28/1072591923

NPR is notably right-wing though.
replied 1292d
It would be interesting to see if Omicron spread through them earlier on and if they saw the less deadly variant of Covid. Coupled with better vitamin D in equatorial regions.
replied 1293d
Giggles is a moron, NPR is like super ultra left wing.
Also she is one of the gangstalkers here, she is a leftist and is friends with other gangstalkers here who supports depopulation.
replied 1292d
Sarcasm you dumb mother fucker. Quit sniffing the sharpies you stick in people buttholes. I'm not a centrist, that doesn't mean anything. I'm a libertarian, look it up.
replied 1286d
Why don't you shutup if you are going to keep lying like a dumbass Sinner...
replied 1289d
You and your friends are commies that spy on people.
replied 1292d
They really do sound absurd with all this. I imagine you made an assumption about them based on how they acted and they thought you must be spying on them to know that.
replied 1291d
replied 1292d
Yeah, it's ridiculous because it is, I don't know why so many people here are spying on others.
replied 1290d
It is more likely that they are not spying. Most claims of being spied on are just a symptom of a mental illness.

Rarely it is other taking advantage or poor password management.
replied 1290d
No actually they are spying. You are probably colluding with them, and that is why they have been arguing with you for the last two years.
replied 1289d
You are confirming that you are having paranoid delusions. It's not that surprising.
replied 1289d
That's right Sam, everything I post is all just paranoid delusions. Thank you for not believing me.
replied 1289d
Everything you post about him spying on you is just paranoid delusions. It was always strange and random they way you jump in to say that.
replied 1288d
He's an alcoholic. He used to always go on benders & insult everyone, then return the following day apologizing. Then he started getting delusional about "spying". I honestly hope he
replied 1288d
| drinks himself to death now. I used to care a little bit, but if he won't even try to help himself, then his demise is the best outcome for him and everyone else. He's an annoyance.
replied 1287d
This lady belongs in prison, she doesn't care about anyone and she isn't a patriot, she is using that flag to virtue signal to right wing people. And she is a gangstalking murderer
replied 1287d
GiggleStick seems to be correct. The drinking problem referred to is pretty obvious to see.

Trying to say that their views are not right wing enough for you says more about you.
replied 1286d
This moron said the Marines rape each other and suck dick. He is probably a stupid leftist just like giggles, they are both pieces of shit
replied 1286d
Yes, marines do rape their own soldiers when they return to base.

I am a liberal. I know I am a free thinker because the left calls me a Nazi, and the right call me a communist.
replied 1286d
Doesn't make you a freethinker. It means society is polarized to the core.
replied 1285d
I refuse to be polarised. Since I refuse to strawman either side I get fools from both sides thinking I am an extremist of the other side.
replied 1286d
goddam commie nazis!!!!
replied 1286d
replied 1286d
Morons like you think nazis are right wing
replied 1285d
Nazi's are right wing. They are the extreme right. If you disagree then you do not understand the words and ideas of the topic.
replied 1285d
Yeah, that is why leftists support depopulation and right-wing people do not
replied 1284d
It's really only nutty environmentalists who want that. There are both people on the left and right who think depopulation would be beneficial.
replied 1286d
What's wrong with Nazis?
replied 1286d
They had plans to bomb New York and stuff.
replied 1286d
I am pretty sure the Nazis won WW2.
replied 1285d
Yeah, but only the first half, they lost the second half.
replied 1286d
replied 1286d

Interview with Jim Marrs
49,416 viewsFeb 4, 2022
2.6K
replied 1286d
This is an interview from 20090407
replied 1286d
You are a dumbass moron.
replied 1287d
I hear that Nancy Bernaiche wants to intern @ the Googleplex...
replied 1286d
Nancy B. is dreading interning @ the Googleplex. This is a new development. I told her 10 years ago Facebook is like cigarettes....
replied 1289d
She is a damn spy she repeated a question I made in private chat on memo which is virtually impossible to do at the same time.
replied 1289d
I was asking the Maxine girl here what temperature it was in the Philippines and then Gigglestick asked the same question here on memo too someone from the Philippines. Giggles = Spy
replied 1289d
You both happened to ask her the temperature at the same time and that is your evidence they are a spy? Hard to say if it is mental health or if you are just stupid.
replied 1292d
No one cares what you think woman.
replied 1293d
support*
replied 1293d
She is just shilling leftist news outlets because she is a leftist claiming and pretending to be right wing, if you ask her, she will tell you she is a centrist.
replied 1294d
Oh really, how is record breaking Israel doing? 5 jab needed to solve that? :D Have fun having AIDS
replied 1294d
Rich countries giving extra vaccination is just political protectionism. You see it more with more protectionist governments. It's not the issue you are trying to make it be.
replied 1294d
In most all cases the booster is optional. Hell in most all cases the initial vaccination is optional. Cases where it is not optional are hot and miss, some make sense, others do not.
replied 1295d
Back to the point that made me butt in...
THOUSANDS cases via VAERS provided by CDC
https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8;jsessionid=E27DD29A867E1D85B5B9CFFE6CC6
Most DEATHS
replied 1294d
VAERS is a good joke. It is not a good source of information since it is so easy to falsify.
replied 1294d
What about V-SAFE or DMED where do you think is a good source of information?
replied 1294d
Often you need to find a study that has sifted through and verified reports to reporting agencies.

Simply stating reports doesn't mean much if they are not verified.
replied 1293d
So where is that study, a good source of information?
replied 1292d
I'm not interested in finding studies for you. I am not the one making claims I need to back up. You have been making claims that the studies you link disagree with your conclusions.
replied 1291d
So you unable to find safety studies, but claim it is safe, got it :D
replied 1290d
You found those studies and linked them for me. I've sometimes kept your links to show to other anti-vaxxers who tried to claim they were lies. I like how your links trigger antivaxxer
replied 1290d
you are unable to show any safety studies, but somehow claim they are safe
replied 1294d
Adverse Event Reports RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Pfizer's own documents for FDA
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
replied 1294d
Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization reports that were kept quiet until courts forced them to be made public recently. FDA requested 75 fucking yrs to release....
replied 1294d
The courts said no. They said the public deserve to know the truth but unfortunately no big news stations
reported it as far as I know
replied 1294d
If there were millions of witnesses reporting something like a crime or even a ufo sighting with very similar details in their stories, maybe a few hundred or 1,000s MIGHT be false....
replied 1294d
Have you even read through those reports yourself for more than just a few? Untl you do that YOU really don't know what you're talking about seriously.....
replied 1294d
Or is your ego so overly protective of your belief system that it won't even allow you to do that?
Also, aout Africa.... Where are you getting your information from? TV news LOL
replied 1294d
Yes, and VAERS does not fit that description at all. Many of the reports are serious, but the data is contaminated by erroneous reports. There is no verification of the reports.
replied 1294d
Many things reported to VAERS are minor allergic reactions. There are also many unrelated issues reported to VAERS only because they happened the day of vaccination.
replied 1294d
Even to the extreme end where a man's gun shot wound to the chest was reported to VAERS because it happened the day the man was vaccinated.
replied 1294d
These things can be verified, and when it matters it likely is verified, but simply being on VAERS doesn't mean much.
replied 1295d
Comprehensive investigations revealed consistent pathophysiological alterations after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34697287/
replied 1294d
Another good study that shows the vaccine works. The study just shows that the mRNA vaccines gives the same immunity type to traditional vaccines.
replied 1294d
Works at reducing CD8+ T cells
replied 1295d
What is waning effectiveness of vaccine? There is no such thing, your immune system is waning, losing T cells.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v3
replied 1294d
The waning effectiveness was just about current antibody counts in your blood. No one is losing T cells.
The study you linked only shows the vaccine is still effective.
replied 1294d
Effective alright, but negative. Have fun having AIDS
replied 1314d
it's not epic &you're not holding anyone a hostage, in fact the whole thread proves what kind of idiot u are. I would say you live in a fucking dungeon &think ur own drop is gold.
replied 1314d
I am still unsure if your English is your second language. You keep not understanding my words when you respond. I never said I held anyone hostage. I didn't say it was great.
replied 1314d
I meant that I never thought of how everyone involved gets a notification, and that it would be interesting to trace the branching structure of the threads. I like data analysis is all
replied 1324d
There are good hard numbers to go by to understand it's fatality. Each nation has its own healthcare capability which impacts the fatalities

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
replied 1324d
You first have to get infected and the infection has to lead to disease

Survival rates per age in the US
0–19 years 99.997%
20–49 years 99.98%
50–69 years 99.5%
70 + years 94.6%
replied 1324d
then you have to separate from covid and with covid
replied 1325d
You show NOTHING of substance, just babble empty vague sentences
replied 1327d
human could not be this retarded, hes a bot ;)
replied 1327d
I feel the same about you sometimes, but I can accept that people can deny reality as hard as you seem capable of.
replied 1327d
I agree on this, do not reply any more, last answer to me proves replies r assembled by a robot - lit saying it's absurd to sue for murder
replied 1327d
It is not murder is the point. There is no grounds for during the company because their body had a rare side effect.
replied 1326d
Like Vioxx, 40,000-60,000 deaths, nobody went to jail, you turd for brains
replied 1327d
mass murderer, that is only statistics
replied 1327d
There is no mass deaths from the vaccines. You've never been able to show that it is killing a lot of people. You've only shown rare side effects happen. Then you deny the Covid deaths
replied 1327d
replied 1327d
Robert Malone is a quack trying to get fame from being an anti-vaxxer. So him being the source makes whatever he linked questionable.

It's interesting wording. Pretty clickbait.
replied 1326d
Good to have your BS arguments on the blockchain for future generations. Calling us "anti-science" but all they do is to discredit/attack source without looking into the subject matter
replied 1326d
17 days ago I asked: Explain why Sam Harris expert in this field, but Robert W Malone, MD, Dr. Peter McCullough, Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM, PhD) are not?
SAM: Robert Malone is :D
replied 1326d
I answered that by telling you Sam is a dr of neurology, and not an expert. He does interview various experts though, including those on vaccines, and viruses, and similar topics.
replied 1326d
It is the many doctors and experts in these fields, and the colleges who worked with Malone on those mRNA studies who have discredited him. It is their peers that exposed these quacks.
replied 1327d
It essentially says that of the rare cases someone died after the vaccine, that 93% of those deaths were from the vaccine, and 7% of other causes. I wonder what other studies say.
replied 1326d

more often than covid, cure worse than disease
replied 1326d
That was not the essence. Conclusion: "Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs."
replied 1326d
At such low rates that they are more of an interest of study for improvement of vaccines, and not a reason to fear vaccines. This study is a reason to trust the safety of vaccines.
replied 1326d
What low rates? Any numbers?
replied 1326d
In your post there was 1200 fatalities in 23 million doses, and at most 93% of those 1200 deaths were from the vaccine. So 1100 deaths out of 23 million using numbers from your sources
replied 1325d
So you agree that 1 in 19000 Dies from jab. At least we are getting closer. You could die, witch is normal, vaccinate you sheep!
replied 1325d
No, but using your numbers it could be as high as that.in reality it could never be that high. It would mean covering up mass deaths. It would imply more than 200K dead.
replied 1325d
Now compare that to the millions of deaths from Covid and you see that even in the worst case for the vaccine that it is far safer than Covid.
replied 1325d
show where you got millions of deaths of healthy or young people
replied 1324d
He obtains his information from 2 sources, failstream media and/or his asshole.
replied 1324d
This woman spies on people
replied 1324d
here we go into schizo land :D
replied 1324d
also the manufacturers of the products (Trusted News Initiative)
replied 1324d
Show me were I said it was only young and healthy people.

Here is the lists of deaths by country, and cases.

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html
replied 1324d
Show me where I said that you said it :D I said that young and healthy don't die, death has average 4 commodities. Even sick don't die if treated early.
replied 1325d
That's only deaths, and only those Pfizer could not hide. There are also other severe neurological, heart, joint problems
replied 1325d
Let's also remember that the harsher reactions from the vaccine are also found in the older and more vulnerable populations. Not healthy people.
replied 1325d
just like covid, they correlate perfectly, common denominator is the Spike protein. Thats why we need treatments not jabs
replied 1324d
No, that is not the common denominator at all. Health is the common denominator.

The fact is at your worst numbers provided vaccine deaths are rare, and Covid deaths are not.
replied 1324d
It is, and your definition of "rare"?
replied 1325d
Likely since you cherry pick studies we will find it's an even lower rate than that when looking at the billions of doses.
replied 1325d
unlikely,
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
replied 1325d
Are these the trials you claim never happened, or finished yet? Love the contradictions and cognitive dissonance.
replied 1325d
NOT FINISHED, you RETARD! :D
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04368728
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 15, 2023
replied 1327d
How would you know, how to measure?
replied 1327d
Well, unlike you I can compare two numbers and see which is larger, and by how much. That is why I know the fee vaccine side effects are inconsequential in comparison.
replied 1326d
Why you unable to show where do you pull your numbers from?
replied 1326d
I get my numbers from the studies you link, and from other experts. The numbers you link are always pics like this with no source. They are often lies that do not reflect the real data
replied 1326d
replied 1326d
Ok, now find a study to back these absurd claims. Links like these are just anti-vaxxer propaganda. When you post real studies they have numbers and data that back what I am saying.
replied 1325d
Absurd, I agree, numbers from Pfizer :D
replied 1329d
master debunker :D
replied 1330d
What year we are in? When do clinical trials end?
Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 15, 2023
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
replied 1330d
Of one trial you found. So what? I am sure some trials were finished before a published end date using regular time lines. Much of this work was done years ago.
replied 1330d
you need more?
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04977479
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 30, 2022
bad zogbot ;)
replied 1330d
another one:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04796896
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 12, 2023
bad bot!
replied 1330d
another one:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 27, 2022
you are a retarded bot :D
replied 1330d
here is another one:
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 5, 2026
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643
replied 1330d
That's the main trial, you retard, show me double blind placebo controlled trial that is finished, bad bot
replied 1330d
I've already shown you the clinical trials results. So you can not pretend they have not been done
replied 1330d
nope, you have not
replied 1330d
More important than data from trials, we have real world data which Trump's any study you can link. Real world data > lab data.
replied 1330d
Oh are you saying that trial is not finished? :D
replied 1331d
He's unable to say what year we are in, maybe hes from the future ;)
replied 1331d
19 September 2014: mRNA-based therapeutics developing a new class of drugs
Besides cancer immunotherapies and infectious disease vaccines...
https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd4278
replied 1331d
2012 Preclinical study: protective vaccination with flue and RSV- specific mRNAs.

That's not even a decade ago.

replied 1331d
Good job contradicting yourself. Cognitive dissonance seems to be a prerequisite to being an anti-vaxxer.
replied 1329d
I'm contradicting myself by pointing out they started PRECLINICAL studies in 2012 for rsv/flu? Not decades like you claim. I've proven my point this is NEW "vaccine" technology.
replied 1328d
You pointed out one preclinical study that started in 2012, which contradicts your claims that it is new. There have been many studies into mRNA, and mRNW vaccines for decades.
replied 1327d
Show at least one double blind placebo controlled out of those many
replied 1327d
As you can see on the timeline, the first study for infectious disease was 2012. That indicates these type of "vaccines" are NEW. Covid vax still in trial. You haven't debunked shit.
replied 1327d
There have been studies for decades... That doesn't mean the technology is decades old. These vax are new. So before you serve more word salad, where exactly am I contradicting myself?
replied 1330d
bad bot
replied 1330d
Don't use a bit to do your thinking then. It's pretty obvious you have been lead down a particular path of bullshit by either a troll farm, or bot making you more predictable to it.
replied 1329d
A farm of trolls, and all this time you've been talking to bots who corrupted your thinking to get you to believe in conspiracy theories
replied 1329d
a zogbot trained by bots :)