There's an attitude in his tone that I don't like. Developers working in BCH are volunteers, they are not getting salary for people to shout at them why things aren't done.
Ok, fair enough, But it is not entirely true that those devs are not getting paid. The reason for the node Flipstarters was to pay devs for work.
Paid for a specific roadmap which they are working on. Issues like this should be followed up on technical channels like gitlab or BCHN/BU slack. Otherwise it's just not constructive.
Well, ok. Sure. But maybe random users don't know that.
This whole thread doesn't make a sense. BCH obviously has very low fees and still someone is here complaining about fees. I don't think it's a legit concern even for the OP
Right now, you're right. But if BCH does a 10x price increase it will start to be felt. A 100x price increase and the issue will be very real.
It's still gonna cost 1 sat per byte. That's all matters not the fiat price
Come on, not even you believe that.
I agree it's not sustainable for new users tho, but the problem with BTC is not that fiat price is high, it's that satoshi price is high. If you could pay 1 sat per byte in BTC
People wouldn't have as much problem with high fees that they have today. It's important to avoid a fee market in the first place.
BTC's inability to scale means it is just a matter of time before people realize it's crap compared to more modern alternatives. Worst at everything except brand name recognition.
just ask yourself. who exactly is collecting these fees? and where do they go to? and who is regulating the amount needed to be considered as fees paid?
I always thought fees are going to Satoshi Nakamoto's Swiss bank account. Isn't it?
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
