This type of user is one of the reasons the mempool limit is still useful, Memo 😙
Especially when these wasteful actions are being performed with faucet funds
Any 'Faucet' funding facility is best implemented with layered limitations.
Indeed - the mempool limit does help.
A faucet 'queue' may also help.
1 or few posts per block?
The faucet does have set limits. Agreed it should be limited by the Memo app, not the BCH network.
One other idea occurs:
An "unfunded posting page"
where new accounts could test-submit what they propose to post
"We" could sponsor such posts that have merit, paying the tx fee.
Wow, I really like this idea. Maybe make it so that once the tipped total exceeds the required sats, have it write to the chain
It would require a new page or sub-section under 'feed'?
where unfunded posts could be triggered by sufficient tips - which then pays the tx fee.
make sure OP gets subsequent tips.
In this ephemeral fashion objectionable material may fail "the sponsor test".
After some timespan (24hr?) unsponsored material would simply vanish.
(This is only for the unfunded).
This - I meant to squeeze in that very important aspect:
Limits set by the mechanism sourcing funds.
(as opposed to "baked into the protocol" which would be disastrous)
Mute this address.
The user seems to be creating multiple accounts and spamming likes on all of them. Muting solves part of the problem, but the feed was still full of muted comments
His logic is totally inverted. Storage cost is the most cheap part in BCH network. More actions means more economical with the same PoW energy cost.
You're confusing your blockchains, SV is the chain that is prioritizing storage. BCH is prioritizing cheap and fast transactions. Even Vitalik is expecting Ethereum data to get pruned
Limiting spammed comments appears to be enabling onchain social networks more than impinging upon them, I just linked a user that it prevented from spamming with faucet funds
Furthermore, this only serves to make the tx count for BCH inaccurate, and artificially inflates BSV's stats. They should move to SV if they want to fuck with a throwaway blockchain
Unlike BSV chain, I never uploaded any files to BCH chain. BCH chain is not for file storage. However, putting "message" on chain is allowed when OP_return was introduced.
Replace "this type of user" with "arsehole". Uses less characters and is more accurate ;-)
It's wasteful if these PoW can't perform more actions. Limited actions with the tremendous PoW is really wasteful like BTC. It shouldn't be happened in BCH, and it's more economical.
It's not wasteful because it isn't a prioritized action, BCH already handles 32x BTC with much less hash or "wasted" electricity. This argument is stupid
Of course, It's not prioritized action. However, it should be decided by miners, not a few of people. If miners included theses "wasteful actions". It's not spam for sure, too.
Mempool admission policies are decided by miners.
