Create account

replied 1241d
Excellent reason to avoid participating in
anything resembling a 'Field of Battle'.
A 'Field of Battle', as a 'Single Point of Failure',
always favors trained weapons.
replied 1241d
Well, maybe. After a series of battles, winners get to choose which dictator rules the people. The people, if they do not take part in the fighting, have no say.
replied 1241d
A decentralized opposition distributed over
a large city interdicting+replacing all govt+support entities
Presuming >10% participation level.
Outnumber all thugs, at every node.
replied 1241d
I hear a lot of these ideas. A small police force of about 20 men working all the time can jail all of these people in a few days. Since they are spread out they cannot resist.
replied 1240d
I guess I have once again proven
I cannot compose a sentence that can be understood:
"Outnumber all thugs, at every node."
How to write "outnumber all thugs..." so it makes sense ?
replied 1240d
If there are more thugs than people then the war is lost,
But (example) Canberra had "a million people"(?) facing a paltry few thousand thugs.
They failed by centralizing the effort.
replied 1240d
The 'war' is not against a single big 'House of Psychopaths'.
The 'war' is against every "box of psychopaths and crooks' that big house empowers.
Shut them all down to win the 'war'.
replied 1240d
My reply was... let's be generous and call it lazy. Your "outnumber" claim was not hard to understand. But I am having difficulty understand how this effort you suggest will work.
replied 1240d
Majority is one issue, "local majority" is another. A country can have 10 distinct regions, and a centrally controlled group can visit them in turn thus "appearing" 10 times stronger.
replied 1240d
"Viisting in turn" is one fatal vulnerability the thugs can never adequately defend.
Such transportation and communications necessary
already have failure modes "ready to trigger".
replied 1240d
I am not sure what you mean here. What I mean is, the govt thugs can be a small minority but through proper centralized maneuvering have majority where it matters most at all times.
replied 1240d
Transportation can be fickle and communications can always fail at unfortunate moments,
especially when assisted...
People make mistakes all the time, especially when they get drunk.
replied 1240d
such "visit-in-turn" operations require Transportation and Communications
but those requirements are hopelessly vulnerable inside a tyranny.
replied 1240d
Vulnerable for the victims not the tyrants surely?
replied 1240d
Any large scale operation
shuffling a group of thugs from one theatre to another is vulnerable.
Repeatedly invading too many "someone's hometown" is how militaries repeatedly fail.
replied 1240d
I never heard of this before. Even if true (I doubt it is) however, surely they can do some transport around and get some of these advantages?
replied 1240d
That is, when this group visits one region, its size needs to be comparable in size with the the particular region only. When it visits a region it can put its "people" in charge.
replied 1240d
In theory the "good people" can find strategies to counter this, but I believe it is very hard to do so in practice. People are just not ready for the decentralization it requires.
replied 1240d
True, that is the biggest problem
replied 1240d
The strategy of "severing the roots" (which I think your shut down stuff refers to) is said by many to be an efficient strategy. However, it is easy to say, not so easy to do.
replied 1240d
Difficult to organize and
requires monumental effort to ensure that all participants follow the plan.
But I, and others, have coordinated thousands, daily, for industrial efforts.
replied 1240d
Brainwashed people, which is mostly what we have to deal with, how do you "shut them down"? Many are well meaning, just misinformed. Some are little more crooked than you or I.
replied 1240d
Most people are a little crook and a little "angel", and they have an internal struggle between the two. If you attack them, you will probably strengthen the crook part.
replied 1240d
Hence, no attacks or violence.
As Bucky said, "...build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
= Simultaneously shut them down and redirect 'civilians' to alternatives.
replied 1240d
Easy to say.
replied 1240d
I do not doubt that there are claims that "soft and weak overcomes hard and strong" (from taoism) and the like. What I struggle with is the implementation details.
replied 1240d
... and I struggle with faith that it actually is generally possible in all cases. We are betting something like the fate of humanity on this after all.
replied 1240d
Many populations will succumb,
spawning many new "Hermit Kingdoms" with their own little god-emperor psychopaths.
But populaces immune and hostile to such silliness shall arise.
replied 1240d
This may be so, but for that plan to work I believe we need to wait and see what happens where. And tyranny might happen in the meantime. And I am not sold on "liberty always wins"
replied 1240d
For many groups of people "liberty always wins" might have been their banner, until they were killed. It may be that all that have saved us from totalitarianism is lack of technology
replied 1240d
People win wars, not munitions.
The NWO thugs cannot be defeated by weapons.
They can best be defeated by deprogramming most of their pawns.
We need to deprogram populations.
replied 1240d
Given a lot of resources, do you think I can make a prison for you that you cannot get out of given a minimum of effort from me, like a couple of minutes a day to check security?
replied 1240d
Such prisons are built all the time,
it is simply too easy to put people in prisons and keep them there until dead.
replied 1240d
Followup question: What if they started putting everyone in such prisons? Would that be a dystopian nightmare situation that "human spirit" does not trump?
replied 1240d
They will, they have already begun.
"Human Spirit", however described or defined,
cannot possibly survive what is happening now,
unless the NWO ultimately falters and disintegrates.
replied 1239d
I wish to add, I sound like a doomsday prophet here. All I really say is, I have no idea what will happen. It could be "the gods look out for us", or it could be we are doomed.
replied 1238d
We must look out for ourselves, as best we can, is about all I can see,
There do exist ways and means:
In any situation there (usually) exists some random freak crack in the wall.
replied 1239d
I am not sure anyone could know for sure what will happen, whether the outcome "actually matters", why we are put through such ordeals as this or anything else.
replied 1240d
"civilians" are in my experience totally impossible influence properly. They "know best" about everything, both "vaccines safe and effective" and the like and how society works.
replied 1240d
6-pack Joe is dumb as a clay brick,
but a population has inertia,
(as 'Hari Seldon' might describe)
derived from the whole Bell-Curve Joe's friends+family occupy.
="Hearts+minds"
replied 1240d
About Canberra, are you talking about the current war on sanity in the name of Covid? Either way I would need quite some introduction to get what you mean.
replied 1240d
Some reports claimed '+/- a million' arrived to protest in one single spot: Canberra.
They tried the decentralized approach before,
but lacked the numbers to pull it off at that time