Create account

replied 1583d
You have severe misconceptions. memo.cash (the front end) is not permission-less.

With memo like social media the frontend is the point of control.
replied 1583d
There's always some point of control.

As soon as Member gets on the desktop / standalone, Memo will become a whole lot more decentralized.
replied 1583d
No idea what your talking about... I used the term permissionless to indicate that there is noone formally speccing what Memo or Member should be...
replied 1583d
... or where it should be hosted... I tried to make my own contribution by porting Member to the cloud.
https://member-cloud.herokuapp.com
Next up will be a reactive web 3.0 version.
replied 1581d
It looks very good, but I can't log in.
replied 1581d
Thanks, I've broken a couple of things, please check back soon :D
replied 1583d
As Twatter said, the frontend is a point of control. You control that cloud app.
There's nothing inherently wrong with it.

Memo is an open protocol. Agreed on permissionless.
Cryptacritic
replied 1582d
Wanting to put controls on Decentralized social media is literally the thing we're trying to avoid.
asd
replied 1582d
You are demonizing me for pointing out a bug/exploit in the system. You just trying to sound smart but you have no idea what you're talking about.
Cryptacritic
replied 1582d
You can't have spam in a system that explicitly makes you pay for usage. That's an investment, a dishonest one, sure, but it still benefits the network. And everyone is free to mute.
asd
replied 1581d
Yes you can! Especially in this case where it’s so easy and cheap to do so and the goal is to boost your popularity. You are actually investing in yourself.
Cryptacritic
replied 1581d
Try liking yourself 100 times. Or 1000 times. 100* the minimum you can send (~500) is 500,000 sats, or 0.005 BCH. 1000 would be 0.05 BCH. "Easy" is definitely relative here.
replied 1581d
these could be very easily filtered.
asd
replied 1581d
Mr.Memo guy even put a ranked system in place what takes it into account how much likes you get and thinking it is fine to cheat it at the same time. Hilarious!
Cryptacritic
replied 1582d
What I said isn't wrong. It's a useful fact to remember for people who think they can curate other people out of existence.