BitcoinABC became the Core of BCH. 🤢
If they did, it's out of merit. BU has fucked themselves by refusing to fork, been disingenuous (holds BTC), has supported an attack - BSV.
Their money is none of your business. BTC is less volatile rn. And in fork time they were the only ones trying to keep the peace.
Then hold fucking dollars or some other stablecoin.
It's not your fucking money
Not sure about that. Amaury parroted the exact same authoritarian narratives that Core used and flat out denied the existence of issues when BCH was disrupted recently...
It took ABC to have the gumption to fork....BU holds BTC and not BCH, which skews incentives drastically, plus they actively supported BSV with a client, had BSV supporters as members
and current members are still engaging in BSV forums.
I can confidently say the BSV cult have actively rejected me from being a BU member /because/ I am uninterested in BSV.
BU doesn't have an SV implementation...
Soooo...
doesn't give me a whole lotta confidence in the organization unfortunately.
It did have one
Did. Not relevant in the slightest to new members joining BU.
I wasn't talking about new members
I am. The BSV cult shouldnt be able to flippantly reject applying members to BU, but they do. Literally a cancer in BU.
Haven't followed closely, I thought BSVtards were expelled.
The expelling is the problem. We should have open arms towards everybody.
Who the fuck cares what BU holds. It's not your goddamn money. Shut the fuck up about other people's personal finances. You aren't crying about Roger holding BTC, are you?
I'm not even defending Amaury....he is many times toxic and does not work well with others....
I'm not sure what you mean by "BU refused to fork, hold btc and supported BSV"?
