SILENTSAM loves to say that he makes arguments while others do not, they just make claims. This is just projection, and something he has learned to say, like a trained dog.
https://memo.cash/a/1af9bfbda4 is one of many examples. SILENTSAM has just claimed (without arguments) that he makes arguments and others make claims and has been challenged on this.
I could go on to break down all the stuff he says in that thread, but I don't think it would really serve much purpose. Instead, now that I have made arguments about the two first...
sentences, I will just make the claim that all he has said so far in that thread are at the same level. But unlike SILENTSAM I am willing to defend my claim in conversation.
This is silentsam proving my point by doing exactly what he is accused of doing. Not even a hint of an argument, just a grand claim. This is also projection of his behavior onto me.
"It is these delusions of grandeur that are why you never have a coherent point to make". This is a narrative that because I never talk to him (he is not worth it), I must have some...
delusion. This is also quite unfounded. As any thinking individual should realize immediately, there are other countless other possible reasons than this narrative.
"You always talk as if you have an audience instead of actually responding to arguments". I just did respond to a claim he made (admittedly not to an argument, he didn't make one)
Also, what he said here, is another set of claims. Also, my comment had a like, so I bloody well have to have had an audience, so talking as if I did not is quite unreasonable.
If he makes a claim, and you counter it, he usually just drops the claim like he never said it, and makes other claims. This must mean he doesn't really believe in the claims himself
Basically his discussion technique is one that 4-year-old could see through. You say something, he replies "that's dumb", you reply to that, he replies "that too is dumb". And so on.
He refuses to explain why the thing is "dumb", even when challenged, which almost certainly means he doesn't really know, he just slabs on that label to everything without thinking.
Since he is quite happy to do this seemingly forever, it is no surprise he often gets in the last word, people just have better things to do than correcting him forever like this.
Especially since he is willing to lie about the whole thing, and most people are not interested in reading such a quarrel anyway. This of course does not mean he is "right".
https://memo.cash/a/c9b7faa4e5 First he makes the unfounded (opposite of truth) claim that I make claims, he makes arguments. When that is challenged, he simply adds a new accusation
When I ignore his new accusation and elaborate on my stance toward his false "I make arguments, you make claims" claim, he adds a couple of new accusations, all unfounded and untrue,
(911 stuff and so on) and he now no longer mentions the earlier mentioned false claim. Later he repeats the accusations that have not yet been addressed.
If they were addressed, the standard SILENTSAM pattern is that he would invent new ones, with no regard for truth, decency or even consistency with his earlier claims.
What SILENTSAM always gravitates toward is a pissing contest. The stance he always favors is the official narrative. He also seems totally without decency, i.e. he lies, distorts etc.
Sidenote2: It is in the nature of platforms like Memo that I cannot ever prove that I am not Twatter. Therefore such an accusation is usually a troll tactic.
If you want to hear me say it: I am not Twatter, and I have have zero affiliation with him beyond the casual public conversation I have had with him on Memo.
You are quite right about this of course. I have had a bad habit of not wanting some of the more crazy stuff he says to go unchallenged, but he says too much such stuff.
It's funny how you get so upset about it. It is just a guess. Seems you both likes the same way of talking, and I think at one point you continued a conversation after switching.
Sidenote1: He makes no arguments in favor of the claim. So his actions (he actually makes claims, not arguments) go against what he repeatedly says he is doing.