I think promoting it is fine. It will be a different issue if he's asking donation for the vendors but proceeds are going to his own wallet (which I doubt that's the case here)
If there's word about donation then it's a scam,. But without it then it's totally promoting,. Sometimes we lie to promote something,.
Edited photo really creates doubt, but I hope this issue will be resolve. This also create commotion in memo. Though also helps other users to be aware in such things like scams.
I think, in my opinion (just my opinion to be clear). It will consider as a scam if you are using others for your own benefit. Or if you're taking advantage on others people.
Whether you want to see ghosts where there aren't any, believe me, you won't get anywhere. I'm being honest. But if you want to continue the discussion, go ahead.
I explained to you that the Bitcoin.com address is different from the Cashonize address, but it's the same merchant seed. I think there's a way to look at this.
Yes Bitcoin.com wallet uses a different derivation path. There is no way to prove these addresses are coming from the same seed phrase without knowing the phrase.
Don't drown in a glass of water. I promise I'm real and I promote BCH properly. There's proof of this. You say otherwise and you haven't shown anything.
The word dishonest,. so multiple accounts doesn't count as dishonest?,. As I remember you once said, it's okay to use multiple,. And maybe you would say it's different,.