I don't dismiss him simply on gossip. I dismiss him because his peers dismiss his claims. They know the subsequent research that has gone on since he did some work early on.
You do dismiss based on gossip and a smear campaign. You talk about "claims" all the time, but you don't even know what "claims" cause you dismissed him and other scientists similarly.
I don't need to know his claims to trust his peers. I don't care what medical doctors think about particle physics the same way they don't care what I think about virology.
A few quacks can, and should, be dismissed without listening to them when the vast majority of scientists in the same field explain why the quacks are wrong. That is trusting science.
Glad we can agree that you *are unscientific and ignorant. Because we're NOT dealing with just a few quacks. Keep pretending it's all just bloggers. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
Oh it is just a few quacks. There is no actual scientific reason to consider the vaccine unsafe. You have never been able to back up your aims with anything credible.
