This Halloween could be interesting in Australia:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rmKxbkj1BXGp/
Be sure to prepare lots of popcorn, nachos, and beverages.
I hope this turns out well for Australia. However, what would stop the oz government from inviting in UN or other foreign troops to protect them from its own citizens?
Deepest suspicions are that ScoMo already has such plans ready to launch. Those U.N. troops would be PRC, because PRC desperately wants Ozzie minerals - without Ozzies. :"Lebensraum"
USA cannot afford the effort. PRC are already there, infiltrated into every facet of society. PRC owns NZ (I saw that while I was there) and control Australian politicians with cash.
I have seen these claims so much, about countries/companies/individuals controlling nations. Seems unlikely it is all false, which begs the question, why are nobody talking about...
government systems that are hard to take over from the outside? I don't know how easy it is to do, probably is hard, but cost of being controlled is huge.
Basics seem to be decentralization, so at least they have to butter up a lot more people. But system also has to be competitive and centralization seem to bring some efficiency
Also, the smaller a govt is, the smaller attack surface, and the smaller attack surface, the cheaper it is to defend. And I suppose the people must be taught about this.
Of course, I know that people today will instead look for "woke" principles like how much we can steal from group X under the guise of fighting X's oppression of the rest, and to
force others to memorize your sexual preference under the guise of treating people with respect and so on. And they will continue to think govt has infinite money for such insanity.
OK, I am not convinced about that one. USA is in a lot of trouble, but so is China, with their huge housing crisis. Also, the main players may be controlling all main nations.
China has no issues it cannot deal with, they have the magickal ability to make their problems vanish with no trace left behind. (exceptions are earthquakes, typhoons, floods,etc)
very drastic, like drop market liberalism or go do a big war (being "police" in Australia will not do I think it has to be a real, and hot war). And even then, leaders will lose much
So what are you saying that they will do to simply make it go away? This has been kind of the way to get economic problems to go away it seems. Now it is overused and about to burst
Any economic problem they will simply redefine in terms they control. Such a miracle would be redefining currency with a new banking system. Over a long weekend, of course
I know China has a history of doing drastic things. However, in an interconnected world, running away from their economic commitments, that can lead to huge problems for them.
Not if who their commitments are to no longer exist or are no longer capable of meaningful retaliation. New videos trying to explain who is running covid suggest PRC has a script.
I have seen no such videos. Yes, there are nefarious forces at play, but I had thought CCP is just a pawn in this one. They cannot dictate the whole world (not yet anyway)
https://odysee.com/@clips4u:3/Chabad:f This is too long but extremely coherent. The single frame-it-and-nail-it-to-the-wall point is that reinterpreting legal issues is a key tactic
There are no experts on China, not even Chinese experts. I speak from a long experience of dealing with the 'expat' end of their culture. They are not all that predictable. War is.
So what are you saying that they will do to simply make it go away? This has been kind of the way to get economic problems to go away it seems. Now it is overused and about to burst