Create account

replied · 50d
Sounds like wishful thinking.Nobody can stop black markets. Guns are already there.Nobody can make them disappear.Everybody has the right of self-defense.You love permissionless money
replied · 50d
Guns kill. Money does not kill
There's too many guns already.
Fewer guns, less violence.
Countries with less guns prove it.
replied · 50d
Wrong. There is no correlation between gun ownership rate and gun homicide rate. Not internationally. Not within the USA
replied · 50d
And the earth is flat? I don't argue with people who deny the facts.
Thank you for the conversation.
replied · 50d
Retardation^2
replied · 49d
No...that is a bullshit statement not backed by anything. There is no correlation to gun rates per capital to crime.
replied · 49d
The next one to deny that Earth is round? Do you also claim that the number of road fatalities falls as more cars drive on the roads?
Any gun can kill. The more guns the more dead.
People kill, not guns you idiot. Get a fucking brain.
replied · 49d
Point to some numbers. If it is so apparent, you shouldn't have a problem backing up your bullshit.
replied · 49d
"The more guns the more dead"
LOL, the most dangerous place in the world must be a gun show
replied · 49d
Compare liechtenstein with germany,venezuela with germany or USA with venezuela.Which country has more gun related homicides per citizen and more guns per capita?3 e.g. with neg.correl
replied · 49d
Comparisons with Venezuela and Liechtenstein are pointless (LIE is tiny and VEN in civil war). I can roughly compare Germany with the USA. The comparison is unambiguous.
replied · 49d
I found a better example:compare austria and germany:same language,same culture BUT austria has WAY more firearms per capita than germany and way less gun related homicides per citizen
replied · 49d
You can also compare norway(more firearms per citizen) with germany(more gun related homicide) or luxemburg(nearly same firearms per citizen) with germany(a lot more homicides)
replied · 49d
I don't compare mosquitoes and elephants. Each country is different. The fact is, if the number of cars in a country increases, the number of accidents increases - same with guns.
replied · 49d
You cannot compare car accidents with gun related homocides. A gun owner is not a murder!

it is false too
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate
replied · 49d
You can't compare countries because they're too different.A car owner is also not automatically the cause of an accident. Nevertheless, more cars-more accidents. More guns-more dead.
replied · 49d
If more guns=more dead why so few people are killed at rifle ranch, police stations, gun shows, military barracks? there are the most guns
replied · 49d
I'm talking about privately owned guns. But you're welcome to buy guns and kill each other. I don't live in the USA and don't want to go there. Definite end of the discussion.
replied · 49d
In germany most guns are shot at ranch with private guns. At german championship there are thousands of armed people with their own private firearms. Nobody ever got killed there.
replied · 49d
If you really think more guns=more death than
-police stations
-military barracks
-gun stores
-gun shows etc.
must be the
deadliest places on this earth
replied · 49d
People who kill a mass amount of people are ready to die. And they are usually targeting a certain group. Race, religion, Relative, love triangle. Whatever it is.
replied · 49d
That's a fucking retarded statement. Most people who kill with a gun don't want to get caught and go to jail or kill themselves. You think they will get away at those places?
replied · 49d
No, because everybody is armed!! See!! More Guns, Less Crime!!
replied · 49d
You think the gunman went into el paso walmart didn't think people were packing? It's Texas. But he didn't care. They all went running anyway. Too much fire power.
replied · 49d
He was ready to die. But gun laws cannot stop this anyway. France's strict gun control couldn't stop the November 2015 Paris attacks
replied · 49d
The assault rifle ban of the 90's worked to some extent. The numbers went down. And they didn't even attempt to get any of them off the street with gun buy backs and such.
replied · 49d
The Republicans try and use the "Crime" rate to make it seem like it didn't work. You can commit a crime and not even use a gun. LMAO. It such a bogus tactic to fool the public.
replied · 49d
You missed the point. Whether there are guns or no guns, unless a person wants to get caught or ready to die, they are not going to shoot people in a highly public place period.
replied · 50d
But you don't like permissionless self-defense? So everybody with a gun is bad? What is with police officers? If you are against guns, you need guns to enforce gun laws