| are wrong. I feel it would be pronounced An-Dree-sEn but the final eh vowel could be pronounced as a schwa like in Anderson.
Third, there is another reason that Adam Back could be
| Satoshi and yet seems to be completely against the original founding purpose of Bitcoin that was not considered. They can't understand why he would destroy his considerable wealth
| this way, but they are not realizing what *could* be coercing him. Namely a large government or other organization that wants to see Bitcoin fail. They might have discovered
| Nakamoto's true identity & threatened him & his family to cooperate, or offered something more lucrative, or otherwise blackmailed him. Honestly, if BCH does succeed despite or due
| to the BTC sabotage, he still has access to a considerable amount of that as well. He just might have to disappear to make use of it.
Anyone who interacted with Adam Back in 2013 on Bitcointalk.org and followed his activity since then knows that he is 100% not satoshi.
I doubt he is. But you can't discount psyops compeletely. They've done crazier shit.
If he was satoshi (and could prove it) then Coretards would be all over that, including Back.
