Create account

replied 1529d
No, not unless they log into Member. Member still posts content with the Memo protocol to BCH chain.
replied 1529d
Is there at least an option to turn off bitclout content? Not sure what i think of this onesided relationship
replied 1529d
I think turn it off would be my preference as well. Not really sure why it was added
replied 1529d
Member doesn't distinguish between different origins at the moment, but will consider it as an option for the future. Thanks!
replied 1529d
So, if we are going to include other blockchain social networks, why stop at Bitclout? Is there plans to sync up with Steemit, Hive, Twetch, etc...?

Im personally not a fan of
replied 1528d
Possibly, yes. Twetch is a closed protocol on a private platform - not sure why they are using a blockchain. I hadn't thought of Hive/Steemit - but maybe. Member could facilitate
replied 1528d
| cross-chain discussion.
replied 1529d
| bitclout, but id be more supportive of the decision if Member decided to become a universal decentralized blockchain aggregator.

And then the next step i think is to send good
replied 1529d
| vibes towards these other projects and maybe they might consider reflecting Memo/Member?
replied 1528d
I agree that BitClout content should be turned off. It just spams the platform with useless content that we can't interact or send bitcoin cash to