Memo
Toggle navigation
Home
Posts
Tokens
Topics
Profiles
Signup
Login
Create account
Dragon-Sided D
replied
1038d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Jason Chavannes
19Y1fA
RBF was created due to mempool size growing beyond block size limit. That should never be the case. IMO there shouldn't even be a block size limit
What do you think about dynamic block sizes? With a fee structure encourage increasing blocksize when it's appropriate to do so, ofc
1
/ 4
1
1,023
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Jason Chavannes
19Y1fA
replied
1038d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Not sure what you mean by dynamic block sizes. As you said there will always be some sort of limit. But if people are hitting it then something is wrong IMO.
1
1,023
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Dragon-Sided D
replied
1038d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
I mean dynamic, as in growing and shrinking to scale smoothly with demand. Seems obvious IMO.
https://localmonero.co/knowledge/dynamic-block-size
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Jason Chavannes
19Y1fA
replied
1038d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
Sounds like a mess, not sure why you'd ever lower the block size cap. If miners can't handle more transactions they should get off the network.
1
1,023
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...
Dragon-Sided D
replied
1034d
Share
Explore
Block Explorer (BCH)
Blockchair
Member
ViaWallet
It's not about miners being unable to handle more transactions; it's about having block sizes that match mempool demand
1
1,023
Message
Cancel
Creating...
Processing...