Create account

replied 1720d
Examples:
replied 1720d
https://memo.cash/a/c9b7faa4e5
First he makes the unfounded (opposite of truth) claim that I make claims, he makes arguments. When that is challenged, he simply adds a new accusation
replied 1720d
that me and TheLegendaryTwatter (called Twatter) are the same person, and repeats the claim.
replied 1720d
When I ignore his new accusation and elaborate on my stance toward his false "I make arguments, you make claims" claim, he adds a couple of new accusations, all unfounded and untrue,
replied 1720d
(911 stuff and so on) and he now no longer mentions the earlier mentioned false claim. Later he repeats the accusations that have not yet been addressed.
replied 1720d
If they were addressed, the standard SILENTSAM pattern is that he would invent new ones, with no regard for truth, decency or even consistency with his earlier claims.
replied 1720d
Maybe he just wants you too think critically?
replied 1720d
If you had read what I said, you would know that he uses this as a troll tactic.
replied 1720d
He hardly seems like a troll, what do you think he wants?
replied 1720d
What SILENTSAM always gravitates toward is a pissing contest. The stance he always favors is the official narrative. He also seems totally without decency, i.e. he lies, distorts etc.
replied 1720d
Sidenote2: It is in the nature of platforms like Memo that I cannot ever prove that I am not Twatter. Therefore such an accusation is usually a troll tactic.
replied 1720d
If you want to hear me say it: I am not Twatter, and I have have zero affiliation with him beyond the casual public conversation I have had with him on Memo.
replied 1714d
You should ignore SilentSam, he is a dog turd pretending to be a human being.

All words are wasted on him.
replied 1709d
You are quite right about this of course. I have had a bad habit of not wanting some of the more crazy stuff he says to go unchallenged, but he says too much such stuff.
replied 1714d
It's funny how you get so upset about it. It is just a guess. Seems you both likes the same way of talking, and I think at one point you continued a conversation after switching.
replied 1720d
Sidenote1: He makes no arguments in favor of the claim. So his actions (he actually makes claims, not arguments) go against what he repeatedly says he is doing.