Then again there are lot of frivolous lawsuits. A lot of anti-vaxxers point to frivolous lawsuits as evidence for their absurd claims. Pointing to a claim as evidence for that claim.
That's not the point. You can distract all you want again. It's about what the attorney at law said. You're not the one who decides he got no evidence. Who do you think you are?
The attorney doesn't matter. He says whatever his clients want said. It has nothing to do with evidence, or facts. Nothing the lawyer has changes the facts of the vaccine.
"The attorney doesn't matter." You mean; I guess you were right, it's not just bloggers from their moms basement. Bad bot.
It most likely is just a blogger, and there is no real lawyer. Just a fake story about one. Even if there is one he is just a mouth piece for his clients.
None of that matters because you can't sue the vaccine makers for calling them a vaccine instead of gene therapy. No one cares about the semantics and bullshit.
Sure SILENTSAM the pharmashill troll. The attorney is just a blogger... You must have done some fucked up shit like you're afraid of something. You can't stop what's coming tho.
I listen to actual attorneys who go after pharma companies. Not fake blogs that make these non issues into stories. Even the people who hate big pharma think the vaccine is safe.
