Create account

replied 499d
BitcoinCash
Show me one major IPV4 upgrade.
Again, IPv6 is here after 30 years and nowhere near massive adoption.
BitcoinCash
replied 499d
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1340,you can find a lot of RFCs in this site, it depends on the definition of "major upgrade", I think BCH is doing what it should to do, for scaling.
replied 499d
I don't see one major update there at all. Just a link salad.
I give you a much simpler counter example. The Netscape browser on my ancient 2002 laptop still shows many websites.
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
I think BTC is ready for u.
replied 498d
So, no major updates to IPv4 you can name, huh?
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
If you think https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791 defines IPV4, and that's the base of the internet not including any of the extension/ high level protocols, I am not arguing with you.
replied 498d
Not arguing here, just asking a question you can not answer. And running out of time.
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
I am glad SV forked off. So BCH can focus on become the best money, for everyone daily use.
replied 498d
Being that you are in such a hurry for protocol upgrades, I hear POS is coming to ABC soon! More like 15 weeks rather than 15 years. You'll love it!
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
POS is not ready, POW is still the best way to achieve decentralized consensus. BCH will never refuse technologies which can make it better. Scaling is the most important thing.
replied 498d
Wow. All brick and mortar stores are going to have BCH at Point of Sale? Nice. I knew it was coming soon.
replied 498d
Shutup troll. I can still see some of your posts. I'll only fix my blocker after memo defo switches to SV.
replied 498d
Nope. you are the troll spreading FUD.
replied 498d
Nixon: I am not a troll.

PoS coming to ABC in the upcoming release:
replied 498d
Douche bag you are a troll.
cbeastsv
replied 498d
Don't feed the trolls. lol
replied 498d
Can't. there is no SV QR code. LOL
replied 498d
replied 498d
Yep it was a big cock. LMAO
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
bitcoin runs totally based on software, except the asic miner. upgrade is an easy thing, just change or add a few lines of code will not cause someone lose money.
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
If you take a look on every success technology achievement, no technology lock themself. IP protocol upgrade rarely because it relate to hardware. Incompatible change cause greate lose
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5944,please stop showing arrogance. There are minor and major changes.
replied 498d
Ok, so a major change to allow for mobile use? Great. After 15 years. I agree this is a mojor change.
But there was a damn good reason for it in 2010.
replied 498d
Yeah just name one, the biggest major change in your opinion. See how that flies.
cbeastsv
replied 499d
IPv6 would get mass adoption if people destroyed the internet and started over. They should have done that in 2000. Missed opportunity. Let's not miss this one to get the real Bitcoin.
BitcoinCash
replied 499d
I am using IPV6 daily.
cbeastsv
replied 498d
IPv6 is 20 years old. Why haven't you upgraded?
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
Why do you think the ipv6 has never changed by 20 years? Just because the name is still the same?
cbeastsv
replied 498d
Why do you think Bitcoin v0.1has never changed, just because the name is the same?
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
If you think Bitcoin v0.1 can win, just build it. Tell Craig, stop attacking people will make BSV a brighter furture.
cbeastsv
replied 498d
Surprise! It's been here since January 9, 2009.
BitcoinCash
replied 498d
If you want 0.1, you should disable p2sh TXs at first. If you do so, most "satoshi" OP_CODEs will be useless.
Mrpumperitis
replied 498d
Where in Bitcoin paper does it say..
stealing old address funds ?
"SUNKEN TREASURE"?




@TeamWinnaar

losing keys != burning coins



@ProfFaustus

Correct

??