Anyone want to argue in favor of the idea that hiding information about scientific data on differences in IQ between races is somehow necessary? Or that it is "racist" to be open about such things?
Certain ethos would have you believe everything is relative and that the laws of nature, human nature especially, are tantamount to oppression,
Indeed, but even given this you could conceivably still be in favor of openness. To me it seems the feminists especially push this in order to make everything about oppression.
If you accept that there are differences between men and women that almost certainly lead to difference in performance in many fields (which really is easy to see in biology), ...
then it is much harder to make a solid case that anything you see on a spreadsheet that is not "women are better off" must be because of the tyrannical male conspiracy to enslave women
In short, the feminists are so hungry for power that even overinflating their victim status is not enough, they have to lie and steal instead, and even then be angry at men in addition
