You can't claim I am unscientific when you are the only one claiming science is a lie. If you are against anything mainstream then you are against science.
The ultimate proof SILENTSAM is an unscientific, ignorant fool. Straight from the horses mouth:
"If you are against anything mainstream then you are against science"
I rest my case.
Yeah, which shows you never had a case. If you dismiss everything mainstream you throw out science as well.
You going to tell me the Standard Model is wrong because it is mainstream?
You had to think 2 days to come up with this brilliant comeback; change the word anything into everything. Your exposed troll methods are unscientific. Period.
I am not changing anything. You are the one who decides anything mainstream is a lie. Science is mainstream. Crack pots are not geniuses ahead of their time, they are just lying.
Denies he first said "anything mainstream" and later "everything mainstream", as if there's no difference. Resorts to calling me Crackpot who "decides anything mainstream is a lie"🤡
You are the one who keeps emphasizing how I am about the mainstream, and act as if anything mainstream is a lie. I am not changing anything, in context they said the same thing.
I was only demonstrating how your exposed troll methods are unscientific.You started blathering about mainstream in a rather pathetic attempt to deny this painful truth.
This discussion is not scientific research. It would be foolish to conduct it as if it was. You have not exposed anything but the fact that I have responded to your claims.
This discussion was about you being unscientific in your troll ways. All you do is slander scientists, call them "anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists". That's what makes you unscientific.
I am not slandering scientists at all. Bloggers are not scientists. I actually read the studies you link and point out that they don't say what you thought they said.
You are slandering scientists. I've proven you're full of shit. You constantly pretend to know what others think, believe, claim. Again, who do you think you are.. the pope of science?
I've told you what colleagues have said about Robert Malone. I have not slandered scientists. I repeat what many scientists have said about him.
Unlike you I use skepticism.
A scientist who did fundamental work on mRNA technology. He is warning about serious dangers, and you dismiss him based on some gossip. That's how ignorant and unscientific you are.
I don't dismiss him simply on gossip. I dismiss him because his peers dismiss his claims. They know the subsequent research that has gone on since he did some work early on.
His work was not fundamental at all. He was just part of a team. He worked on a small part of the issue like many others.
He is looking for 15 minutes of fame. This has been more lucrative for him than his career.
Yup. You're validating my point again. Not once have you dared to address any of the things he's saying. All you do is slander. You just did it again, and you even deny doing it.
So quit your act. And stop lying. We all know it's not about this one scientist. The pattern in your bullshit trolling methods is obviously exposed. You're a disgrace to real science.
I'm not a research scientist. Your and my comments on the subject are irrelevant. My education was physics and computer science, not biology. I know enough to trust the peer review.
You think I am exposing troll tactics. I am trying to expose you to critical thinking and skeptical thinking tactics. Exposing you to tactics capable of spotting deception.
You do dismiss based on gossip and a smear campaign. You talk about "claims" all the time, but you don't even know what "claims" cause you dismissed him and other scientists similarly.
I don't need to know his claims to trust his peers. I don't care what medical doctors think about particle physics the same way they don't care what I think about virology.
A few quacks can, and should, be dismissed without listening to them when the vast majority of scientists in the same field explain why the quacks are wrong. That is trusting science.
Glad we can agree that you *are unscientific and ignorant. Because we're NOT dealing with just a few quacks. Keep pretending it's all just bloggers. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
Oh it is just a few quacks. There is no actual scientific reason to consider the vaccine unsafe. You have never been able to back up your aims with anything credible.
Yeah, which shows you never had a case. If you dismiss everything mainstream you throw out science as well.
You going to tell me the Standard Model is wrong because it is mainstream?
I hope phrenology doesn't make a comeback.
I sure hope not. There will be no way to hide being a anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist.
