Create account

Cryptacritic
2013d
Fuck Bitcoin ABC. It's leaders are toxic and it has way too much power. Also all it's supporters are SJWs.
Kaizen
replied 2013d
At least ABC has skin in the game. BU mostly holds BTC.
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
That shouldn't matter at all. It's not your money.
Kaizen
replied 2013d
Of course it matters. It's like the CEO of Apple holding mostly Microsoft stock.
Cryptacritic
replied 2012d
That doesn't matter either. Stop worrying about other people's money.
replied 2012d
Ever heard of a conflict of interest?
Cryptacritic
replied 2011d
Ever heard of private property rights?
replied 2011d
Answer the fucking question without bringing in irrelevant shit. I in no way am arguing to steal their funds.
Cryptacritic
replied 2011d
Not your money. You don't get to say what's done with it.
replied 2011d
Now you get muted
Cryptacritic
replied 2011d
Not your money, not your problem
replied 2011d
We clearly don't have property rights if they can be taxed too any amount. They broke the Constitution. ~
replied 2011d
~ Inflation caused by the central banks will make owning property impossible because you simply will not be able to afford the tax.
replied 2011d
"The rent is dirt cheap but the property taxes are too damn high."
Kaizen
replied 2012d
You don't seem to understand the concept of incentives.
Cryptacritic
replied 2012d
You don't seem to understand the concept of private property rights.
replied 2013d
BitcoinABC became the Core of BCH. 🤢
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
Strong Agree! They need to sit the fuck down a little bit!
replied 2013d
If they did, it's out of merit. BU has fucked themselves by refusing to fork, been disingenuous (holds BTC), has supported an attack - BSV.
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
Their money is none of your business. BTC is less volatile rn. And in fork time they were the only ones trying to keep the peace.
replied 2013d
Then hold fucking dollars or some other stablecoin.
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
It's not your fucking money
replied 2013d
Not sure about that. Amaury parroted the exact same authoritarian narratives that Core used and flat out denied the existence of issues when BCH was disrupted recently...
replied 2013d
It took ABC to have the gumption to fork....BU holds BTC and not BCH, which skews incentives drastically, plus they actively supported BSV with a client, had BSV supporters as members
replied 2013d
and current members are still engaging in BSV forums.
replied 2013d
I can confidently say the BSV cult have actively rejected me from being a BU member /because/ I am uninterested in BSV.

BU doesn't have an SV implementation...
Soooo...
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
Citation needed
replied 2013d
replied 2013d
doesn't give me a whole lotta confidence in the organization unfortunately.
replied 2013d
It did have one
replied 2013d
Did. Not relevant in the slightest to new members joining BU.
replied 2013d
I wasn't talking about new members
replied 2013d
I am. The BSV cult shouldnt be able to flippantly reject applying members to BU, but they do. Literally a cancer in BU.
replied 2013d
Haven't followed closely, I thought BSVtards were expelled.
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
The expelling is the problem. We should have open arms towards everybody.
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
Who the fuck cares what BU holds. It's not your goddamn money. Shut the fuck up about other people's personal finances. You aren't crying about Roger holding BTC, are you?
replied 2013d
I'm not even defending Amaury....he is many times toxic and does not work well with others....
replied 2013d
I'm not sure what you mean by "BU refused to fork, hold btc and supported BSV"?
replied 2010d
I think you are wrong, most BCH supporters are capitalists/libertarians.
replied 2013d
I guess you need to throw in BCHD, Verde, Flowee, Bitprim, etc. too right?
Cryptacritic
replied 2013d
Why Flowee? I like flowee