Create account

replied 782d
How can you know without long term safety studies?
Ok then, can you show me any safety studies?
replied 782d
You've linked enough studies that verified the safety already.
replied 782d
And you are unable to show 1 :D
replied 781d
I am unwilling to put in the effort to look. I've linked them before. It's a pretty easy Google search.
Your inability to understand them would lead you to wild ideas though.
replied 781d
Pretty easy search, but you unable to find one :)
replied 781d
I won't bother since you already found them and posted them here. You have yet to post a single study that backs your ideas. Every study you link confirms what I am telling you.
replied 781d
You can't, clinical trials are still in progress, you are a lab rat, have fun having AIDS ;)
replied 781d
The safety studies were done before it was approved for public use. Seperate independent groups reviewed the data and did their own trials. You just bury your head in the sand though.
replied 781d
What safety studies? Show me!
replied 780d
Here, since Goggle search is beyond your capability.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/research/publications/index.html

Pick any safety study you want. General, or specific risks.
replied 779d
myopericarditis after vaccination has been periodically reported
replied 779d
Yes, and at the rate it is reported it is not a significant issue.
replied 779d
DMED
Total Number of Acute Myocardial Infarct Reports By Year up 343%
Total Number of Acute Myocarditis Reports By Year up 184%
Total Numbe of Acute Pericarditis Reports By Year up 70%
replied 778d
Exactly. That is my point. The increased rate of these rare conditions was from both Covid, and the vaccine. The amount from the vaccine are hard to distinguish from the background.
replied 779d
However, some serious adverse reactions were reported, such as the life-threatening allergic reaction, anaphylaxis
replied 779d
Yes, as happens with all medication. The rate was low enough to be of no real concern.

Comparative rated seems to be your weak point when it comes to understanding this topic.
replied 779d
no long term safety studies here, try again
replied 779d
Are you asking for information from the future and pretending you are rational?
replied 779d
oh so they don't exist?
replied 779d
Pregnant people were not included in the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.
replied 779d
third one:
following J&J/Janssen vaccination of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia, which involves blood clots in the brain with low platelet counts
replied 779d
Yup, and the rate was so low as to be difficult to distinguish between the background noise.
replied 779d
OK, 2021 first one:
Of the 8,624 Janssen vaccine recipients, there were 64 reports of anxiety-related events, including 17 reports of fainting
replied 779d
Exactly. No real problem. Funny how you are quoting a study you claimed didn't exist.
replied 779d
They don't, and you wrote that they can't exist
SILENTSAM:
Are you asking for information from the future and pretending you are rational?
replied 778d
I linked the safety studies to you, and you were just quoting them.

Long term safety studies are ones done after the fact.many years of them show how rarely there are such issues.