Resisting getting benefits means leaving the benefitted area. That isn't immoral. I feel like I am not fully getting the question.
Why do thieves and bullies get to lay claim to any area by providing something after theft? To justify that thieves and bullies stay while the abused leaves is morally abject.
The only thieves and bullies are those trying to take advantage of the system without contributing to it as asked. To steal from the system everyone else contributed to.
If that were actually happening, you'd have a point. The entire issue is the inverse: Money is taken from you regardless of whether you consent, there is no such "theft".