Extraordinary claims require at least *some* evidence. A plethora of studies are available measuring the efficacy rates of various face coverings. Got any to the contrary?
The danish study studied the efficiency of surgical masks on the wearer, with everybody claiming for months they do NOT protect the wearer from others, but others from the wearer. BS
Pretty straightforward. Cloth masks don't protect 100%; they just dramatically reduce the amount of exhaled "plume". N95s filter out the dust&mist that virus rides in on.
There are dozens more. It's clear you are not well informed but highly opinionated and, I'll wager, likely to have been unmasked in public many times in the past year.
Wanker. That's what people think when they see you out with no mask. Selfish antisocial cunt. Middle of a health crisis and this fucking fairy wants to be special by not wearin a mask
Funny how you dipshits who think the entire world is conspiring against them in some grand plot by secret group led by B Gates to inject them with a microchip claim others are scared !
Do me a favor. Go to your local hospital -- doesn't matter where you are -- and chat with any nurse that works there. Maybe she can introduce you to some more not-sheep
And therefore unless you have been tested you have no idea whether you are an asymptimatic carrier. Would you shoot a gun into a crowd if you had NO IDEA if it was loaded? Disgusting
Lots of issues here. First and foremost, this is not a direct measure of virus transmission with vs without masks. It's a policy review. Even Danes break the rules sometimes.
Cloth masks don't protect the wearer much; N95's do. Just 1 asymptomatic maskless person in a room can easily infect dozens of people wearing masks. This study doesn't catch this.
For example, the study doesn't control for duration. Aside from super-spreaders (which do happen) most people need to be in close proximity 5 mins or more. Not likely in grocery store.