#BSV roadmap: accept bitcoin protocol as it was designed and kiss (keep it scaling stupid). Also get rid of self-proclaimed "protocol developers" in the process.
#BCH roadmap: Accept bitcoin protocol and make clever optimizations that gives magnitudes of scale and kiss (keep it scaling stupid). Also get rid off high-horse statist brown nosers.
This is so misleading it's a bit insane. Avalanche isn't a part of BTC protocol, and dependence upon LN for scaling is the issue, no one's opposed to second layers. Why do you lie?
Nobody is talking about BTC. Nobody at BCH is opposed to LN because they don't understand sustainability of its security model. Eventually you'll settle for more inflation.
I'll trade you BSV for your remaining BCH 1:1 if it means that you'll stop shitposting here, I'd happily make that investment to have you babbling on the loony blockchain you belong on
Keep trolling if you insist, you're just adding activity to our side of Memo and showing everyone how stupid you are lol. Plus I'm getting tons of likes for correcting you :D
Will you trade mine for fair market price? I have 3,000,000 satoshis ready to trade on memo. Nobody is taking them, despite my multiple attempts to get rid of those ABC coins
LN is not part of the base protocol. I do not see what is wrong with Schnoor. It is superiour to ECDSA in every aspect. Only reason ECDSA was used was due to its (now void) patent.
You just said that BCH's roadmap was to "accept the Bitcoin protocol", are you saying that BCH accepts its own protocol if you aren't talking about BTC? Because that's a given, nutso
The ideologues made me move away from it as well though, if you strip away the scapegoats and bullshit marketing, CSW doesn't really have anything to sell. Plus that Centralized Calvin
You've said that like 3 times in the past day, how is this anything like 2017? It wasn't one guy who wanted S2X. Calvin is Core in this situation, trying to control Bitcoin to profit
Calvin is winning by investing into mining datacenters and everything else. You prefer winners by POSM and centralized interventions, same as core did.
I run a datacenter myself you jackass lol. You think that BCH only had centralized support? Part of the reason people broke away from Core was *because* it was too centralized
"Centralized Calvin" -> Bitcoin is based on competition for profit. And again you sound like let me run my small miner core. I am a loser and can't compete therefore others bad.
LOL you mean "let me run my small node Core"? You can't even get your basic points straight! Too fucking funny. Calvin props up SV all alone, hopefully people get out before exit scam
That was paraphrased for you, dumbass. It's good to know there is a miner dedicated protecting the chain. When BCH price goes down again Rogers jizz will not be there anymore.
LOL that's not paraphrasing at all, "node" is even shorter than "miner" jackass. Please keep talking, you're doing an excellent job of discrediting yourself for me
LOL, yeah I'm sure that's what you meant. I didn't say it did, I said "'node' is even shorter than 'miner'". I'm saying it's way easier to say it correctly, if you know the facts
I am sorry if everything needs to be brought simple and boring to you. All you can do is jump on some distracting detail and ignore the subject. What's next? My grammar?
I'm just laughing over how you're confusing issues, not asking you to make your replies "simple and boring" lol. Are you crazy? Please sell me on SV if you think I'm trying to distract
You said earlier today that you were just here to troll me lol. I'm wiping the floor with you, you can't even keep your Bitcoin history straight. Did you lie about when you got in too?
I know, it's amazing. Discrediting you in front of the ideologues is so satisfying, and Memo is so cheap to use that I can probably keep using my unsplit coins for the rest of the year
I'm the only person liking your comments lol. I love it when you all decide it's a good idea to open your mouths and expose the BSV idiocy, everyone wins!
Lol downplay it now, you were just acting like I should think likes were so important. I'm considering following you if all of your trolling is this self-deprecating and inconsistent
...what? When did I mention that I got more likes? I said that I was the only one liking your comments, are you a compulsive liar or do you have a memory disorder?
You said you get a ton of likes for correcting me and also I only got likes from you. Math must be as hard as paraphrasing for you! Also connecting the dots. You like it simple. Gotcha
I also mentioned multiple times that it's because I want to drive on-chain activity. You've really gotten fixated on the likes thing, huh? Guess it shows why you got into fake PoSM BSV
I dumped a lot of mine when it first spiked after the fork, I anticipated that lots of BTC maximalists would buy it to troll BCH, and decided to profit off of them lol
Well, to be fair. There is some real development with value going on on the BSV chain. I am not denying that. What I don't like is the cultist behaviour and the adversarial modus op.
Why did SV hashrate plummet so much after November if Amaury was the one who forked off miners? Isn't it more likely that Calvin rented hash ahead of the fork? Where is it now if not?
Do you only speak in poorly worded, factually incorrect statements? BCH hashrate was at a record high in November, wtf are you even talking about in August?
Aw, don't want to troll anymore? Too bad, you "gave me purpose" XD. You shouldn't have revealed how much fun you were, please call me "kiddo" again or say "nothing personnel" lol
Miners mine what is profitable. They care not to suck a chain dry on the short term. But their investments are aligned with long term sustainability of the network.
Yes, BSV aligned miners mine BTC and BCH as well for profit. They are also signaling long term commitment to BSV chain. Also, some miners are rigging BCH DAA to suck more out of it.
Well if you check the data and math it's easy to spot anomalies. Also economics, why turning off rigs if you can use them and earn money? SHA-256 is the market.
No, that would be you. One example, Coingeek had around 1.000PH for 6 months and before fork they brought another 1.000PH, right now they use 250PH on BSV.
...seriously? They were trying to get *funding* into the project lol, not miners. Idiot investors with BTC who think stealing old coins and ranting about socialism are actual solutions
I'm not interested in watching Craig contradict himself again. The guy is acting like an utter jackass, he has to be in the middle of a midlife crisis or psychotic breakdown
Yes, that would mean that you would have to start to think with your own brains and stop just echoing what others said. And that would wipe away your illusion... scary.
Lol wtf are you even talking about? I already linked you Craig's own words, I don't care if he goes back on them. It would just show that he's as inconsistent as he is illogical
3/ ..To allow for this vision and end, the SV implementation of Bitcoin will be removing the flawed code that allows “burning” of coins permanently. This is not an instantaneous...
And the issue with Coingeek wanting to steal old coins is that it shows how much of a racket they consider BSV to be, it would destroy the market. They're going to exit scam so hard
Oh yeah, I'm sure that's why bitcoin.com has a DASH pool- oh, wait. Can't seem to find anything about DASH at all there, perhaps you could link some sources for once?
He's said he's opening a BCH-based crypto exchange, of course he doesn't want to knock the competition that will drive revenue. BCH isn't afraid of competition either, no need for hate
Roger is using diversification. This doesn't work well anymore, not even for stocks. It will work even less well for crypto currencies where the winner will take 99% of the market.
Yes, jackass, but I mostly just don't want misinformation stored on the BCH blockchain without any rational or skeptical response. I also want you to get the help you desperately need
I know that you're only here to mislead, it's not that big of a secret. It's just confusing that you make statements like "diversification doesn't work" that are so easily proven false
Maybe in your world BTC is still bitcoin. But in mine, it lost too much of original design to still be called bitcoin. Hence if it wouldn't there would be no need for BCH/BSV forks.