How can you say there is no need? Why should we wait for a need to arise? If BCH goes up 10x in price (very likely) fees will be over a penny. This is too high IMO.
So are you willing to write the code or pay for this feature or you are just here bitching about a non issue without contributing anything?
There's an attitude in his tone that I don't like. Developers working in BCH are volunteers, they are not getting salary for people to shout at them why things aren't done.
...and by the way, I will personally chip in again. Anyway, a limited 0 sat/byte tx per. block has been discussed at some point, so it is not a totally unfamiliar issue.
Paid for a specific roadmap which they are working on. Issues like this should be followed up on technical channels like gitlab or BCHN/BU slack. Otherwise it's just not constructive.
This whole thread doesn't make a sense. BCH obviously has very low fees and still someone is here complaining about fees. I don't think it's a legit concern even for the OP
I agree it's not sustainable for new users tho, but the problem with BTC is not that fiat price is high, it's that satoshi price is high. If you could pay 1 sat per byte in BTC
BTC's inability to scale means it is just a matter of time before people realize it's crap compared to more modern alternatives. Worst at everything except brand name recognition.
just ask yourself. who exactly is collecting these fees? and where do they go to? and who is regulating the amount needed to be considered as fees paid?