Create account

replied 2727d
You can see by the market caps that the majority went with BCH and not BSV. If I am a business, I am not going to be an idiot just to take a stand.
replied 2725d
agree with you but dont like the market cap argument in isolation b/c people say the same about BTC & BCH. market is 'deciding' every minute.
replied 2725d
BCH and BSV are competitors. BCH and BTC are not competitors. That's the difference. BTC is just trying to be a store of value. BCH is trying to be a currency.
hv_
replied 2725d
BCH and BTC cannot compete. They follow teams with floppy agendas. BSV only follows the White Paper.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2725d
It looks like BSV follows a roadmap...and doesn't quite understand how sitemaps work: https://bitcoinsv.io/roadmap-new/
replied 2725d
I'm having fun just reading through looking for typos lol

>PR. 001 Enhanced Scripting Capalibility

>PR. 002 Increased Scriptiing Capacity

> SC.011 Initial Scalling Improvements
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2725d
I'm trying to find Mr./Mrs. nahf962kizq https://bitcoinsv.io/author/nahf962kizq/
replied 2725d
BSV only follows Coingeek, if they go under then the project is dead. That's not decentralization.
replied 2725d
yeah, "in isolation" b/c like you say there are a ton of other important differences to consider.
replied 2725d
"BCH and BTC are not competitors"

lol, do you seriously believe that?
replied 2725d
They are not competitors. They are striving for 2 different goals. BTC is no longer trying to be a currency. The community tells you to use your credit card over BTC. LOL.
replied 2725d
That is BS, otherwise the Core cabal would have changed the basic marketing and white paper too.
replied 2725d
Every single crypto currency competes for the same userbase (potentially, all the internet connected people).
replied 2725d
Completely not true. But I expect that from a TWAT.
replied 2725d
How is it not true?
replied 2725d
VET and XMR are not pursuing the same userbase. Plenty of other examples
replied 2725d
Are you guys really going to pretend that not all crypto communities want their shitcoin to be as widely adopted as possible?

Haven't heard of VET, but XMR wants to be money some day
replied 2725d
They want price to go up, sure, but they aren't going after the same userbase. Another example is XRP, they're mostly pursuing banks.

Userbase =/= shitcoin holders/moonboys
replied 2725d
Lol, that's just laughable. If it was true (XRP targeting banks) then XRP wouldn't be the most heavily shilled scamcoin in existence.
replied 2725d
XRP would have a potential use case if banks weren't corrupt as fuck and actually wanted to charge lower fees. The fact that it's a scam doesn't mean it isn't built for banks
replied 2725d
The other problem with ripple is there are like billions of ripple locked up owned by the creators. If they start dumping all that into the market, Ripple will crash.
replied 2725d
XRP brings nothing to the table in my view.
replied 2725d
Agreed, especially in a world where BTC exists.

But banks would probably use/buy it to keep a controlled blockchain competitive if BTC wasn't so controlled and gimped by BS
replied 2725d
What's laughable is out of 2000 cryptos you are trying to make an example with 1. LOL
replied 2725d
Then you didn't follow the conversations carefully enough....
replied 2725d
Sure they all have wallets and they want you to use their coin, but money isn't their main focus.
replied 2725d
You're somewhat right. The main focus of most of the shitcoins is to get retards like you buying it. :)
replied 2725d
I only buy BCH. It's the only one that will be money for the world. I don't need anything else.
replied 2725d
you're not hopeless after all. 👍😂
replied 2725d
There are over 2000 cryptos and you are telling me they are all trying to be money for the world? LOL. Just look at the projects. Continued----------
replied 2725d
No, I wasn't talking about all of the micro-cap shitcoins that you idiots try to get rich with. There are about 10 cryptocurrencies today that worth to mention and 3 real networks.
replied 2725d
I see where you're coming from, I feel like they are still technically still competing projects simply because they compete for the same hashrate though