Create account

307d
replied 307d
Are you really implying that BCH needs more throughput to handle the current transaction load? Even BTC has been regularly clearing its mempool recently, no one is using crypto.
replied 307d
No, I'm implying the network needs a higher soft limit to avoid shitting itself like it did over the weekend.
replied 307d
Did the network "shit itself"? My transactions never had any problems clearing. I wouldn't have noticed this SV thing unless someone pointed it out.
replied 307d
Based on my standards yes.

Check the following, this is what I fled from:

An this was BCH over the weekend:
replied 307d
What do you mean, fled from? Would your transactions not confirm?
replied 307d
I had a fair number of BTC transactions get stuck in late 2017/early 2018, even a few LTC txs, but I think it's hilarious that he's acting like this is typical in BCH lol
replied 307d
I'm not acting like that, dicksnorter.
replied 307d
People didn't call Maxwell "1MegGreg" until the cap caused serious problems

You're whining about Amaury over an adjustable softcap that pools forgot to change lol. You are *drunk*
replied 307d
Look at #2MegSechet's responses. He flat out declined that the issue exists.

I know a group of devs where Sechet would fit in perfectly.
replied 307d
If you want to bitch at the pools too, that's fine, I'll even support that effort. But your anger is completely misplaced, it's a fucking soft cap my guy
replied 307d
The pools do seem to have been ridiculously lazy. We've had 2+ MB blocks for how fucking long now? And they STILL won't support them.
replied 307d
I mean, seriously we had 8 MB blocks back like what? A few months after the hard fork in 2017? Two fucking years!
replied 307d
Yeah I was thinking the default should be 8MB since that's what we forked to first, even 2MB shows that BTC needs to upsize blocks though, look how fast BCH chewed through 3 attacks
replied 307d
Actually, I was underwhelmed by the pace due to the silly 2MB limit and Mr Unknown doing 1MB blocks.
replied 307d
And I get that nothing should be seen as an attack, everything's just a test for the network, but with even half of pools mining bigger blocks the backlog dies very fast. Plus 0-conf
replied 307d
Frequent backlogs undermine 0-conf.
replied 307d
Everyone should send emails ASAP.
replied 307d
To where?
replied 307d
To all the BCH pools
replied 307d
Well i think Roger Ver is here on Memo. I'm surprised he doesn't know or care, since apparently Bitcoin.com pool is doing this too.
replied 307d
I don't think that Roger checks memo frequently.
replied 307d
I don't think that Roger checks memo.
replied 307d
There was a post from his verified account recently.
replied 306d
"a" post
replied 307d
sigh. Are you that green? I fled BTC because it was kept crippled artificially which lead to what you see on the pics.
replied 307d
I'm a bit tired, yeah XD
replied 307d


This is not organic lol. You're falling for troll talking points again, this is just another lame SV attack.

They try this every update, pay attention twat
replied 307d
This would be "shitting itself" if this caused any problems, but the only goal was division, and you're the only one buying it. Turning from 1megGreg onto Amaury lol, you're the Judas