Create account

799d · Bitcoin Cash
Another breaking change by BCH. Being forced to upgrade BCH node again...
replied 797d
Spicy opinion 🔥
replied 799d
Live stream for those interested -

https://m.youtube.com/live/vIUEL_2fiac
replied 799d
That's a good thing, right?
replied 799d
I mean soft forks are worse than hard forks. But IMO all forks are bad.
replied 799d
Well not if they improve stuff
replied 798d
^this

"failing to fork & improve" is how you get ossified broken BTC
replied 799d
In a perfect world one codebase handles all possible needs, so everyone accepts it. In a real world, you cannot expect that all people pull in the same direction. Sooner or later there
replied 799d
will be so much disagreement that groups will naturally go their own ways because there is no way to agree anymore, and the disagreement is too expensive to handle without the split.
replied 799d
Sometimes one group will fail, sometimes the two groups create such different products that two needs are met by the two products that one product could not meet on its own.
replied 799d
I agree that when possible in practice, it is best to avoid splits, so the splits can be seen as an "evil". But I don't think it is reasonable to say they are always a bad thing.
replied 798d
again
replied 799d
What happened?
replied 797d
annual scheduled network upgrade
replied 799d
2023-05-15 / BCH upgrade / break change
replied 799d
Come on..
replied 799d
Not everyone wants the rules of the system up for a vote every 12 months. I know that's controversial.
replied 799d
I agree that consensus changes can be breaking & with time they should become less frequent & severe until finally ossification. No crypto is ossofied yet. More work is needed.
replied 798d
> No crypto is ossofied yet

*cough* BTC *cough*
replied 798d
Not to mention BSV: As recent as a couple of months ago hardforked in a rather radical feature - coin confiscation w.o. private keys. Absolute garbage scam!
replied 794d
When did this happen?
replied 794d
Earlier this year. Its called "OP_CourtOrder" I believe.
replied 794d
replied 793d
Yikes
replied 790d
LOL. That's kinda hilarious.
replied 789d
Yes it is
replied 798d
Thats a lie. Calling it softforks and than continue to fork in complicated tech dept ..cough...Segwit...Taproot...cough... you know :-)
replied 799d
So you also don't upgrade the node version when there are improvements beyond consensus? Like validation speed up or improved RPC stuff, bug fixes etc.?
replied 799d
Read.Cash also derailed, for the moment.
This method of coercing people to comply with someone's whimsies
has odors usually accompanied by flavors of last night's leftover vomit.
replied 799d
read.cash is up and running again incl. tipping etc.
replied 799d
Indeed, all good again,
ready to compete even more seriously with all that other rubbish out there.