Create account

BitcoinHoarder
replied 2345d
So stop snowballing Amaury and configure your hobby node? Or you prefer to be stuck with limits and confinement 🤷🏻‍♂️😂😂.
2 / 18 1
1,337
replied 2344d
Feeling a little salty? I guess you need to increase at least _one_ metric :-D
replied 2345d
One node has almost zero effect on a real decentralized network
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2345d
Completely understand and agree. I only respect mining nodes. That’s why I made fun of adjusting the ABC “hobby” node. BSV is #1.
1
722
replied 2345d
I just love when the retards of Statist Vision claim that they only respect miners while BTC has 90%+ of the global SHA256 hashrate.
2
1,101
replied 2344d
Not to mention BCH having 6x the miner activity compared to BSV. #MinersChoice right? LOL
3
4,888
replied 2344d
6x the miner activity... lol... what kind of metric do you use in alphabetland to get this multiplicator? It has to be unicorns or something.
replied 2344d
...Unique miners? A single entity producing almost 50% of SV's hashrate does not a decentralized blockchain make. Could at least disguise it as a pool, but Coingeek is an embarrassment
3
8,989
replied 2344d
Quacking about decentralization just for the sake of it makes you sound like core 2.0
replied 2344d
..and what you call "toy nodes" are merchants etc. You SV guys are like a religious cult.
2
11,234
replied 2344d
Merchants can use specialized solutions, they not necessarily need to run nodes themselves. Especially when things scale, the burden of it won't cover the benefits.
1
replied 2344d
In case of coordinating node configs it is easier with centralized mining like we see on BSV. That is basically all I am saying. Well, quacking or not, it is a fact.
1
3,333
replied 2344d
It is easier, but not much. You need 3 pools on BCH and 2 on BSV to get 51%. One or two phone calls will do.
replied 2344d
Unique miners can't be counted. There are 6+1 pools/big miners on BSV and 11+1 on BCH. So where your 6x came from? Decentralization is looked as being open and competitive for everyone
replied 2345d
Lol the implication was that Calvin controls the grand majority of nodes. Of course it's easy to broadcast changes to SV, just call Centralized Calvin. https://sv.coin.dance/nodes
1
555
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2343d
Poolin has been mining BSV for weeks now also based on your link.
2
2,337
replied 2343d
I'm talking about nodes lol, there's only one implementation for SV, and Coingeek likely controls most of them.

It's easy for Coingeek to point their miners at different pools too
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2341d
The set of rules is set. That is decentralized. Decentralization refers to the rules. Remember that Craig and Calvin were majority miners keeping BCH alive at one point too
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2341d
Other BTC miners mocked them for keeping BCH alive while it starved for hashpower


About Privacy Terms Stats