Create account

replied 1788d
He has not countered "The virus has not been isolated", nor "The PCR test is not suitable for diagnose", nor "The death tolls are people dying WITH, not OF corona" for example.
1 / 27 1
replied 1788d
These facts are easily verifiable, which is why your confidence is a joke. You posted the speculations of random bloggers as your only evidence. The first was plain false.
1
replied 1788d
They have not only isolated the virus, but can track if you had a strain from Europe, or directly from China.
1
replied 1788d
If he was able to show that the virus has been isolated, he would have done so. Instead he slabs on something that is not at all a proof.
1
replied 1788d
Here is an article about the six separate strains of Covid they have isolated.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200803105246.htm
replied 1788d
The funny thing about your weak claims is that they are so easily debunked. You only offer opinions, and so they require no situation to debunk. You have zero evidence.
replied 1788d
Articles for laymen are often inaccurate. The virus was not isolated.
replied 1788d
For example, see top of this, which refers to a CDC document:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/10/jon-rappoport/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
replied 1787d
That is the blog post of some random idiot meant to confuse the layman. Thanks for showing you still use random bloggers as your source, and so have zero evidence behind your claims.
replied 1780d
Silentsam is wrong about most of what he says here, but I find it unproductive to discuss with him as he displays troll behavior. I would be happy to discuss this issue with non-trolls
replied 1780d
What you really mean is that you only discuss things with people you agree with, or who can not provide evidence that debunks your ideas.
replied 1788d
The second was a blogger upset about one type of test which was irrelevant since it was not the main test used go diagnose people.
1
replied 1788d
The inventor of the PCR test said it should not be used for disgnosis. This goes far beyond the strawman that SILENTSAM presents.
1
replied 1788d
Thanks for supporting my point with this. This is not the test used to diagnose people. It is a simple test to give out to a lot of people to help find people for the official test.
replied 1788d
Quotes from
https://fullfact.org/health/coronavirus-pcr-test-accuracy/
replied 1788d
Antigen tests are “not widely used for coronavirus testing currently”.

PCR tests are generally seen as the gold standard for Covid-19 testing.
replied 1788d
Add to that, the media isn’t calling out college administrators for keeping the programs open during a pandemic.

CLOWN.WORLD.
replied 1788d
Yeah, it is crazy to risk e futures of young athletes. Even if they survive they run the risk of scaring in the lungs.
replied 1788d
They’re welcome to refuse participation. In fact, if they did that in concert, we’d have fewer transmissions and greater access to tests or medical personnel.
replied 1788d
Unfortunately, football is the state religion.
replied 1788d
Testing is a complete and total joke. Case in point; a shortage of kits, but collegiate and professional football players being tested several times a week for a recreational sport
replied 1788d
The last was trying to claim that people who also had other conditions should not count, which goes against all logic since we expect those with other problems to be hit worse.
1
replied 1788d
People who have died in traffic accidents who were reported to have corona in their bodies have been counted as corona deaths, which is then used to set policy. Again a strawman.
1
replied 1788d
You are not making a strawman so much as believing lies. Your grasping at straws with that failed logic that anti-vaxxers have been failing with.
replied 1788d
The under reported cases, and death count are easy to pull out of the statistics. The claim you are making with no evidence require no evidence to debunk. It's just a lie.
1
replied 1788d
This is not easy to pull out of the statistics, it is generally not even attempted. The approach has been to not investigate deaths if a test suggests covid in someone's body,
replied 1788d
but to simply count it as a covid death. This actually has been openly admitted. I do not have this in front of me, and I do not feel very generous after having been called a liar
replied 1788d
by a troll. If some non-troll wishes to know I might bother to look it up.


About Privacy Terms Stats